The Perfect Salary for Happiness: $75,000
blogs.wsj.com
blogs.wsj.com
1. I need some sort of reference point as to where the happy people earning $75,000 are living. This hardly needs to be said on HN, but $75,000 in West Virginia is a lot different than $75,000 in the Bay Area or NYC (for that matter, it says nothing of taxes either).
2. The article claims that people's "satisfaction" continues to increase the more they earn (beyond $75,000), but doesn't say why that doesn't increase their happiness. Is the increase in "satisfaction" being offset by something else, or is "satisfaction" (as they define it) simply orthogonal to happiness?
It's only an anecdote, but: My income would be the same regardless of where I live, and I'm pretty sure my choice to live in NYC provides me more happiness than most other possible choices.
When I started making about twice that I realized I was in a unique position and better buckle down and be more serious about my job, which was far less fun and often quite stressful.
Once you get beyond that it's still not as fun but at least one is banking a lot of money so when the gravy train ends you can just retire to somewhere cheap for a few years.
I know a little bit about these kinds of studies. One of them is measuring minute by minute "emotional" sorts of happiness, that's usually what they label "happiness" or "experiential happiness." The other is when you sit and evaluate your life, they call that satisfaction or "reflective happiness."
Actually, the results shouldn't be so surprising. We've only such a capacity for neurons and chemicals firing in our brain, of course a millionaire can't feel 100 times more satiated from food than a guy making $75,000.
Honestly though, I don't believe in experiential happiness, it doesn't matter so much to me. It's just biochemistry, animals feel that kind of happiness. Reflective happiness, thinking happiness, "satisfaction" - that's the one I optimize for. The biochemistry takes care of itself if you live good habits of gratitude, good friends, doing meaningful things, and take care of your basic health.
No matter how many good works you do, how much charity you do, how much money you make, your basic "happiness" or minute by minute emotional happiness only can get so high. But reflective happiness has almost an unlimited capacity, and doing more things you find meaningful does bring that up.
It was always puzzling to me as a child that the people doing the hardest work are paid the least money. (hard in the sense that it physically drains you, and your whole body aches)
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1668979
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1668909
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1668478
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1667603
Business Week, LA Times, New Scientist, Inc.com, and now Wall Street Journal.
Take your pick.
Here is a quote from a poster in one of her class rooms: "behind every great fortune is a crime".
(Though with all the laws today, it's hard not to break at least some of them.)
Did the poster in the classroom provide any of the many examples of fortunes that began with crime? To say that "every" great fortune began with a crime is false, but certainly many did.
It's like a lot of articles that say "you should pay your coders well, but most of them don't care about salary beyond a certain point, they'd rather work on interesting problems." What?! Sounds like bullshit justification to me. Sure it's nice to work on interesting problems, but isn't it nicer to work on interesting problems AND get paid well?
This is a very strange statement. What about the taxes? What about the difference in the value of $75K between say Chicago and Ulan-Bator?
Another one is an assumption which seems to be remarkably common: the assumption that everyone knows when they're happy and when they're not.