I see gravity as more of a property of the universe, every atom in the universe is attached to each other atom in some way.
I see gravity as more of a property of the universe, every atom in the universe is attached to each other atom in some way.
I see gravity as more of a property of the universe, every atom in the universe is attached to each other atom in some way.
Please don't do science like this. You should use experimentation to differentiate between theories.
I imagine a bowling ball rolling down a blanket stretched tight at half light speed. The bowl shape of the blanket in front of the bowling ball would be very different from the rear. I'm just pointing out that if gravity goes light speed, then something coming toward the earth at half light speed will have a longer delay for us to feel the gravity, and as the object leaves the earth, its gravity will linger longer. Maybe it's true, it boggles my mind.
If gravity is light speed, then an object travelling toward you at light speed will have no gravity until it has touched you. We should be able to detect shock waves like a jet breaking the sound barrier breaking all the windows in a community because the sound builds up. Gravity would build up too.
If something is moving at the speed of light, then light (or gravity) is emitted from it also at the speed of light.
But if you add the two together, it doesn't equal twice the speed of light. Yes, I know it's weird, but that's where the whole time dilation comes in.
I think this was confirmed in an experiment where scientists measure the speed of light from the sun both during sunrise and sunset, since the relative speed between the sun and the measurement devices are different due to earth's rotation (sorry, don't have a link handy for all this, I probably got some details wrong but you get the idea).
I guess the theory of general relativity would extend this to gravity.
This is a problem because...?