That is pretty bad advice. Baiting with the "outsourcing is cheap" but not citing the statistical increase in failed projects is a disservice to those looking for genuine information.

Worse yet taking an easy exit like "I'll leave it up to you to decide" is punting the responsibility of disclosure. You should either not mention it, or inform you readers that outsourcing required intricate detailed knowledge in technical development, or one can loose control of the project, which directly translates into a higher risk of failure and total loss of investment. It is also your duty to inform your readers that recovery of funds is impossible due to the disparity of legal systems and protections afforded under international law. AKA, if you get ripped off you have little recourse and the recourse you have is more expensive that the money lost, in regards to sub $200,000 projects.