How I Used Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to Validate my Startup Idea
harperlindsey.wordpress.com
harperlindsey.wordpress.com
Force them to make a choice. Present Web app A (real), Web app B (dummy), and Web app C (dummy). Make them rank which web app is best.
Set up the survey three ways: A, B, C. B, C, A. and C, B, A. Have a third of the sample take each survey. You would be surprised at the first choice bias with Mechanical Turk. Actually you wouldn't be surprised when you remember that these people just want to get the thing done.
Finally a good secondary survey is to make them rank order features for their worth. This helps find your MVP. (Read more about "conjoint analysis" if this interests you.)
Clearly, the author got his $27.50 worth; how much that's really worth, though, in the long term, remains to be seen.
TLDR: Be HIGHLY suspect of any results you get from mechanical turk (same goes for feedback army and others).
And to be fair, even if I am trying to be super-honest, I find it very hard to decide whether I would be happy to whip out a credit card from a concept pitch. It's not just a question of "would I pay for A", it is a question of "would I pay for A it it really rang my bell", and I can't tell whether you are going to ring my bell or not until I have tried your product and your customer support philosophy.
When I look at my credit card statement, I see a bunch of companies not just whose product I like and use, but also a bunch of folks for whom I can say "I like the way they do business".
I didn't pay to cloud-store photos for over a decade, until I found smugmug. So what is the right answer to the question "would you pay to store photos"?
This isn't the kind of nuance you would get from an MT survey I don't think.
"I also found out to my surprise that more men than women said they’d use the service. I fully expected it to be the other way around." 200 people is not a large sample size and I would caution you against making sweeping decisions about the future of a company based on this small size. It could be that the MT program attracts more men than women? I don't know how you set it up but you said earlier that you didn't really do any segmentation.
They're both 100% useless.
Mechanical Turkers are incentivized to give positive feedback because there's a chance (lurking in the back of their minds, surely) that people are emotionally sensitive and if they get criticized, they will be emotionally wounded and won't approve their HIT.
Do you know how I know this? I asked Turkers to give me feedback on one of my sites, and it was nothing but sunshine and razzmatazz smoothies.
You know you're building something people want when they vote with their wallets or attention (give you their email address, phone number...)
New Theory: hell, an even better test might be are they willing to "invite their friends" to tell them about it? People share things with friends because they like their friends - is it of sufficiently high value that they will get a "social credit" for sharing with their friends?.
You could compare a few pictures, videos, landing pages, etc. And get some a vote with a comment on which is better.
Forced more legwork on the user to actually create multiple options.
Mechanical Turk seems to be filled with people itching for some community to participate in -- why not get paid for it at the same time?
Getting honest feedback probably depends very heavily on survey design, instruction sets, and, if you've been doing it for a while, reputation.
With a jobs size this small you'll get information that might be useful, but will probably be biased. I wouldn't trust it - but I would use it as a starting place.
For the incredibly low price I think it's worth it.
Do MTurkers tell the truth though? Presumably one person can run a dozen fronts so that they can answer questions that require a specific demographic. Or they masquerade as elderly females to appear more trustworthy and shame you out of objecting if they've not done the job properly or whatever.
Even in Russia it's about the average income IIRC if you assume 40-hour workweek.
It costs you nothing to say "yes", but everything changes as soon as you start to charge for it.
Going from Free to $0.01 for any online product or service significantly changes your conversion numbers.
You might get better feedback standing on a corner downtown, asking if people would use your service... and charge them $1 for a voucher that would allow them to use it when it is ready.
PS: Please get out of stealth mode!
I spent about $20 to get 200 responses for my question, but only ended up collecting 103 answers before the question expired.
None of this stuff is perfect, but employing a few of these approaches all at the same time will generate results that can be handy to correlate.
Also, just to clarify, it's $17 for 200 responses.
Thanks for trying out PickFu!
It was a great experience overall, and for micro-testing (where something like Usability testing is too much) PickFu is on my short list for future projects.
Glad to hear it!
Edit: I meant how exactly were the survey looked like, including the service description. If it's a paid service, I highly doubt the 73% figure.
I gave a brief description of what the website/service offering would be then asked the users:
Gender
Age
Would they use the service as described above
Give me 3 examples of how they would use the service.
General feedback or ideas on the service, why they would or would not use it.*This greatly reduces fraud, and shoddy work. And it has a tendency to highlight the really good workers (some of which are amazing!) - maximizing your benefit as a requester.
I also ran a couple of polls with similar intent on MT and then stopped doing that because results were skewed dramatically. For one there's no filtering by a geographical region and you bet your 10c-per-answer that you will get a ton of replies from the poorest corners of the world. Secondly, responders are afraid of you rejecting their answer and thus affecting their MT rating, so they tend to tell you want you want to hear and not what they actually might be thinking. Hence your 73% approval rate.
This sampling is not random, very far from it. You are effectively sampling MT community with its own dynamics, the community that is likely NOT to be representative of your own target user base.
How do you plan to accept payments? How much would Houdini itself cost (per task, per month?)? Do you plan to accept non-US users?
Pricing is still TBD. MTurk charges will be passed through directly to you with Houdini-specific charges either per task or per month.
Yeah, I'm planning on accepting non-US users.
As others are suggesting, Crowdflower works, and works well, with an excellent API. Also they are just good people. (They use an assortment of workforces)
For smaller jobs self service jobs like the one described in this article SmartSheet UI is amazing. http://www.smartsheet.com/ (MTurk based)
And if you need bigger stuff (or text oriented stuff), with some consulting you can contact me, or my company http://castingwords.com (MTurk based)
We did a blog post referencing a study:
http://blog.markiter.com/#turk
http://behind-the-enemy-lines.blogspot.com/2008/03/mechanica...
Which has been updated recently. Some high quality data presented in a clear way.
http://behind-the-enemy-lines.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-demog...
http://behind-the-enemy-lines.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-demog...
* United States: 46.80% (65% female)
* India: 34.00% (70% male)
* Miscellaneous: 19.20%Of course, that's easier said than done in certain circumstances.