If it's an actual law, that sounds utterly absurd. Good on Netflix for not playing ball.
If it's an actual law, that sounds utterly absurd. Good on Netflix for not playing ball.
We have laws on the percentage of "foreign" music you are allowed to play on radio stations (to fight against the evil english language), laws that prevent TV channels from playing films on friday or saturday evening (to protect those poor cinemas), laws that govern the number of pharmacies by number of inhabitants and disallow ownership of multiple pharmacies or ownership by non-pharmacists (to protect them against the great evil that is competition)...
While that seems a bit over the top, I find the part where it must be owned by a pharmacist quite reasonable. It's the same in Germany.
That there should be a licensed pharmacist at all times in the store - fine. But why does the store have to belong to one? To take a stereotypically German example, we don't say that all garages have to be owned by mechanics :)
More information on it: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronologie_des_m%C3%A9dias
Reed Hastings