Is it just me or has a whole generation lost the concept of personal responsibility? I don't use FB because it's been obvious for a long time this was happening, and it's an awful platform, designed to socially engineer their flock of product people.
Use products that you control. LineageOS + FDriod is a great start.
Which is why societies have come up with a far better method: collectively decide (or collectively choose people to decide) on reasonable limits for certain types of transactions.
My German law professor used to say that she never read ToS. Because under the country's law, they are either reasonable or unenforceable.
Such laws have nothing to with censorship. If you really need your users private messages, you just have to more explicitly present them with the choice, and respect their decision to say no without unreasonably denying them service.
The US has far more lenient standards for such one-sided contracts, but the basic principle is obviously the same: If Facebook were to add a paragraph giving them ownership of your house somewhere deep in the ToS, they wouldn't stand a chance in a court of law.
Why else would nearly every single popular conservative media "character" be so uncannily similar? Why did nearly all of those characters triple down on this machismo roughly 18 months ago? Could it be that they got back the results of their latest A/B test?
I think this all drives at the most interesting, world changing possibility that could come out of this reckoning with Facebook. What will happen when it becomes conventional wisdom that the true power of collecting all of this data is not the ability to predict what you will do, but the ability to direct what you will do? What will happen when it truly registers with people that this necessarily removes their agency? What will prevent that critical mass from making the trivial jump in logic that advertisers and public relations firms have been progressively improving on these same skills to the same general ends for a century?
Don't use Facebook - it's basically a tool for turning any little aspect of your social network into ad revenue. Communicate directly with people you actually value and fuck the rest of 'em.
Don't use Dropbox, their employees have access to all your data, so does someone who breaks in. Encrypt your data before it hits the internet or forget about it.
Don't use a paid VPN service for anonymity, they have your billing data and connecting IP directly and you have no way to verify if they "don't log". Don't trust them. Use an anonymity network which tries its damnedest using technical means to mask those sorts of details.
If you give someone else your data, think not what they can legally do with it, but what they can technically do with it. Write laws all you want, Facebook will still abuse your data to the maximum, attackers will still get access to far too much data, it doesn't help. Personal responsibility is the final solution to the problem. When you give someone data, always assume the worst. Computers have an amusing tendency to tend to make technical feasibility into reality.
As I wrote in another thread, I have used LinkedIn for a long time, and I have never wanted it to spam my contacts, so I have always had it foremost in my mind to click "No" whenever it asks to import them. Yet at some point, it did it anyway, because it asks me if I want to connect with people who are only email contacts and not on LinkedIn.
Now if you had complete logs of everything I did with my phone and computer, you might well be able to prove in court that I inadvertently gave permission at some point - perhaps I didn't read all of the legalese on something, or perhaps my finger slipped and I forgot.
I can't imagine I would find anyone at LinkedIn who cared about figuring out what happened, regardless.
There is something perverse, in my view, in appealing to "personal responsibility" of individuals dealing with corporations, as it seems to me that the entire concept of a corporation is a way for people to work together as an entity without taking personal responsibility. The reason we have corporations is because it's impractical for people to be held liable for their screwups.
They can scoop your contacts and SMS messages in 10 seconds after the first permission was granted. Maybe permission should also limit the number of contacts/messages it can access.
I have to think that violates phone tapping laws in certain states.
What’s obvious to you in your very limited field of expertise is not obvious to everyone. You shouldn’t insult everyone who isn’t a programmer by equating that narrow expertise with personal responsibility. I wouldn’t assume that your inability to understand a conversation between two surgeons meant that it was acceptable to harvest your organs.
Relying on experts to audit things is obvious and correct, but they must be "anyone", not just a select few that get to see the details. Maybe I am not qualified to evaluate something, but that is never a reason to prevent me from looking at the same information the experts have, in fact that's how those experts came to be.
The fact that some people don't care is irrelevant. They get tricked, and learn. Consider how many people are re-evaluating what FB even _is_ right now.
"The alternative goes right to rules that prevent everyone (not just FB) from remembering things, and ultimately more censorship."