it's still limiting if you define it to broadly. if i defined a law that said every owner of a home will be punished if somebody in that home smoked weed or did drugs.
and airbnb is gone, and so on.
and airbnb is gone, and so on.
The intent was to protect people who are being harmed against their will (held in sex slavery against their will).
Of course the actual effect of the law is different than the intent. The actual effect is limiting.
We're talking about seasoned politicians, not naive dreamers.