The idea that Uber should release more data which won't be analyzed Donnelly but will only fuel even more speculation doesn't make much sense.
The NTSB is investigating. They are extremely through. Most importantly once all the data has been carefully analyzed and the failure mode had been understood the NTSB will be able to devise guidelines and protocols to prevent it from happening again.
Until then I don't see how all this speculation helps except to fulfill some sort of misguided anti-Uber fantasy.
Can you list all the "baseless speculations" in the discussions/blog post?
Either way is a fail.
[1] - https://www.thefreedictionary.com/speeding - "The act or instance of operating a motor vehicle or motorboat faster than allowed by law."
https://www.nhtsa.gov/risky-driving/speeding
> Speed also affects your safety even when you are driving at the speed limit but too fast for road conditions, such as during bad weather, when a road is under repair, or in an area at night that isn’t well lit.
I agree with that statement only if we define "best" as "for the common good." The best thing in Uber's own interest is very likely to lock that shit down and hold onto it until a judge makes them give it up. Somebody died here, and it very well may have been Uber's fault. Uber could very well be on the hook for a tremendous amount of punitive damage.
People won't accept the nature of how image recognition tends to fail - ie seemingly randomly and catastrophically. Assuming a driver-less future, we'll definitely see more of these random tragedies.