Lithuanian is riddled with references to bees
bbc.com
bbc.com
I'd be nice if author list more words than single one (bičiulis). The other example is a bit incorrect - yes we do have different words for dead animal (dvėsti) and dead human (mirti), but each can be used opposite - if your beloved died you'd rather use "miręs" or if you curse at someone you'd tell them to "dvėsk".
“There is an ethnic nationalist movement among Kazan Tatars that stresses descent from the Bulgars and is known as Bulgarism – there have been graffiti on the walls in the streets of Kazan with phrases such as "Bulgaria is alive" (Булгария жива)” – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatars
Born in Kazan, I never seen or heard of such movement, acts or news. Yeah, 118 people of 0.5M (blind guess) defined themselves as bulgars in 1989. But no one except themselves was aware of this “nationalist movement” since then. And no one tries to understand the real meaning of that graffiti, because our teenagers are often into something strange or schizophrenic-flavoured in their street paintings. But I bet this will hit headlines at the day when some erudite politician will see a good profit from it. And people will “oh no, national extremists among tatars!”
I wonder how much of a history was written that way.
This has a different photo of the painting in In-Aouanrhat: https://blogs.harvard.edu/houghton/2015/09/10/spirit-of-the-...
The Roundhead style rock art that these belong to dates from about 9000 BP to about 6600 BP.
This has more about the sacredness of the bee: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bee_(mythology) Yet, it is lacking a lot of stuff, including how bees appear in Finnish epic poetry.
This ties into some cultic bear-worship tropes, too, which i believe also still persist, having to do with the fact that bears, like humans, have true names, and it is Not Wise/Not Possible to speak them -- thus the allusiory naming conventions.
I'd learned from a graduate school course in germanic linguistics it was likely bear-wolf...but i'm curious where you got your claim.
Seems like the slavic version is roughly equivalent to “honey eater”.
Personally I’ve always thought this is because bears can both stand on two legs and roughly share a diet with humans. :)
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/what-does-dagnabbit-me...
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-Eur...
I just dug into the topic a bit more and came across the theory that King Arthur's name means "bear king" - fun correlate with the "Bee Warrior" mentioned above :)
From Wikipedia: "Another possibility is that it is derived from a Brittonic patronym Arto-rīg-ios (the root of which, arto-rīg- 'bear-king' is to be found in the Old Irish personal name Art-ri)."
Indo-european had a word for bear, but it's completely eradicated in germanic languages, and replaced with the noa-name: Bear. The brown one. The original rtko/arktos/ursus never made it.
Wolf works the same way in Swedish, the common word is "varg", which is a noa-name meaning cattle-killer. Ulv, derived from ulfr/wulf/vlk exists and means the same thing, but it's archaic.
It's not on the face of it a very confidence-inspiring source, but r/askhistorians is as good as Reddit gets, and the poster here wrote an actual book on the subject. Give it a read: https://thingsonreddit.com/things/13812/comments/
I thought it would be more wide-spread, but there's wikipedia pages for it in Swedish, Norwegian and Iceland at least:
I’ve read it now, and that’s so cool. It also cam with some good references I’m going to get into now. Thanks again. :)
Though it might be archaic in Swedish, but it is also the Norwegian word for wolf. I'd guess that it is really easy to adapt the archaic Swedish word if the person has lived or spent a lot of time in Norway.
So the word is still there, it's not completely taboo like the original word for bear.
Bear: Ari Wolf: Ujk
https://letyourlanguagespeak.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/twelve...
Baltic and Slavic languages are related.
You look at an etymological dictionary for either language.