> I'm just pointing out that this isn't free for the sake of being benevolent. It's free for the sake of capturing market share.
this seems like it could be a false dichotomy. it's not obvious why it can't be both.
this seems like it could be a false dichotomy. it's not obvious why it can't be both.
That's not how this word works. We can use another one.
I hasten to add, again, that I'm attributing nothing pejorative. I'm glad Epic have done this. It's great marketing that may be helpful to lots of people.
If on the other hand they would release the assets without strings attached (for use with any game engine / in any way) then I'd say this word would apply.