Couldn't an astronaut's DNA be sampled before and after a mission and compared?
Couldn't an astronaut's DNA be sampled before and after a mission and compared?
It is always better to have more data points to rule out several variables, especially considering that it is rare to have an astronaut with a twin sibling.
> As a result, the more relevant comparison (and one NASA did) is Scott's DNA before and after his time in space. That can tell us how many changes were picked up while in space. But as noted above, he would have probably picked up some mutations even if he sat here on Earth. And that's where his twin Mark, who did sit here on Earth, comes in. Mark's before and after gives us a sense of the normal background rate of mutation on Earth. Comparing that rate to Scott's tells us the important number: the degree to which this rate is elevated in the environment of low-Earth orbit.
Then why is it significant that time in space changed it?