I remember hearing about programs like this perhaps 15 years ago, so I'm not surprised they're ongoing.
I remember hearing about programs like this perhaps 15 years ago, so I'm not surprised they're ongoing.
[1] https://www.irishtimes.com/news/killing-may-end-the-blind-ey...
"America in stereotype" is more accurate.
Your Netherlands comment is also hyperbole. Here's an article about a kid who was shot and killed on an Amsterdam playground a few weeks ago. Two other people were wounded by what in America would be called an "active shooter." But that only happens in America, right?
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/910572/Amsterdam-shooti...
For example, according to healthdata.org, in 2016, physical violence by firearm was the cause of 210.5 DALYs per 100,000. In the Netherlands it was 10.8.
A DALY is a standardized metric defined by the WHO as "lost years of life" to measure the burden of a disease or other affliction.
So in 2016 physical violence by firearm caused 20 times more harm per capita to the US population than to the Dutch population. I'm willing to bet that for self-harm and accidental firearm wounds the gap is even larger, given the idiotic habit Americans have of keeping guns and ammunition stored in their homes.
There are tens of thousands of towns, villages, and cities that see little to no gun violence each year. But they don't get written up in the Daily Fail.
And just because a town isn't incorporated doesn't mean it's small. Pahrump, Nevada, for example, is 40,000 people and it's not incorporated.
That wasn't the comment.
The comment was that most surgeons in the Netherlands can wait decades before seeing a gunshot wound. If they want hands-on experience, the US is a good place to learn. I think that's a very reasonable comment (EDIT maybe "years" is more reasonable than "decades"...) and if you account for accidents and self-harm, you really don't need to go to Chicago or Baltimore. The vast majority of gun wounds in the US are accidents or self-harm and occur all over the US, including "quiet little towns". I would argue that the real fantasy is to think that the gun violence epidemic is limited to big cities with black guys in hoodies shooting at each other.
The violent crime rate in Chicago is lower than ~30 other US cities. It sits about even with Tulsa.
The thing that makes Chicago stand out is that its population transforms the rate into a larger raw number.
I decided to check the right-wing conspiracy theory that if you dropped the top four Democratic controlled cities from the US numbers, we'd be in the range of other 1st world democracies. No idea which cities those are supposed to be, but I assume Chicago and NY and LA and St Louis.
Spoiler alert, we're not. Even throwing out all gunshot murders from IL, CA, NY, LA, MO (New Orleans), while keeping the population, still doesn't get us below 2x rate of CAN. You have to toss TX, NJ, MT, OK, to get in the ballpark.
Edit: sorry, missed you were talking about murders; I was using data for all deaths.
Obviously not everywhere in the US has the same rate of gun deaths, but compared to The Netherlands anywhere is high.
The US would have to have a Parkland style school shooting every hours on the hours for the next 600 years to catch up.
Today, or even in the last decade, the risk of gun violence is far, far greater in the US is far greater than Europe.