Hacker News Reader

Can that be true? (I'm channelling 1985 here, so I could be well off, but...)

IIRC, some of the janky stuff I did on the Apple //e 6502 did run on the Apple IIc 65C02. I'm pretty sure they didn't fall of into NOP-land. (Again, I could be mis-representing this, but I was taking some shortcuts at one point to accelerate some graphics that ended up in a Broderbund game, so I don't think I am? (Time wastes all memories - I could well be wrong))

View on HN

Ah-ha, well! There are actually two Apple IIe models. (Well, there was a third "platinum" one too, but let's not talk about that.) One would have shown "Apple ][" at boot time, and this was the original model with a 6502 NMOS-based chip. But they later released an "enhanced" model, which had a 65C02 CMOS chip. You could tell the difference because the later model would have instead shown "Apple //e" when booting.

It's quite possible (perhaps because you typed it as Apple //e!) that you were actually working with that 65C02 variant, and thus, your janky stuff was forgiven by the Gods of Early Personal Computing (blessed be).

(See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_IIe)

I did not know that! I think it said //e on the case and ][ when booting, but I'll have go dig it out of storage. (You'd think that after spending thousands of hours in front of the dang thing, that I'd remember...)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com