Enemy within: gut bacteria drive autoimmune disease
news.yale.edu
news.yale.edu
This seems like the perfect place for machine learning and big data. What exactly is the hold up? Is it regulations? Is it old fashioned doctors unwilling to push boundaries?
Ive been dealing with mysterious stomach issues for a long time myself, and I'm living for the day where I can hack something together to cure myself, at this point I've lost faith in doctors; and my problems in the grand scheme of things aren't even that bad, I can only imagine how other hackers must feel...
Edit: I've been getting my own ML startup off the ground just recently, but if anyone is doing something in this area, even open source, I may be interested in collaborating, let's talk!
My guess is that human flora are orders of magnitude higher in complexity. They all interact with one another and diet. It’s hard to find numbers, but at least one place indicated over 500 different strains in the human gut.
Monsanto reacts extremely aggressively against any publication, from anybody, suggesting any potential issue with their products. For instance when the World Health Organization indicated that glyphosate is a probable carcinogen, even they came under sustained aggressive assaults from Monsanto's PR and 'approved science' machine. That sort of pressure is something that, if you're a researcher who's not ideologically driven, is going to work as a major deterrent.
And of course it's entirely possible that glyphosate is not the cause here, but it's something that you presumably would want to extensively research first and foremost due to its ubiquitousness and interactions with gut flora, yet that's not really happening, on the scale it should be, outside of studies with major conflicts of interests.
--------
EDIT: One quick addendum. The reason I jumped from analyzing gut bacteria in and of itself to examining outside players is because your gut biome is going to a product of environmental factors. So it's not so much the biome that matters as how we are changing it, unless you assume that there has been no real change in incidence rates over the decades but simply more widespread reporting - which is certainly possible and something that would also need to be investigated.
Basically eating clean and eating smart seems the only way out coupled with yoga. Yoga seems to help all these conditions. It seems yoga needs to be studied more from a scientific purpose to see why it works
It's incidence also, anecdotally, seems to be increasing.
* Whole 30 anti-inflammation diet
* Mysore-style Ashtanga Yoga
If both are done diligently together every day, after 2 weeks you will likely see drastic improvement.
It's not a cure - if I stop, after 2 days I'm back in excruciating pain. But when I do these regularly, I can go through the day forgetting that I have neck problems.
Even though the doctor (Gundry) provides mostly anecdotal evidence in his book The Plant Paradox - you might want to try cutting out cashews and nightshade vegetables which are approved on Whole 30. I felt a difference when I cut those two things out.
After extensive testing, I believe they cause serious issues for me (fatigue, bowel issues, etc)
But when I search for info, I just find sites from sort of woo-woo sources. (Chiropractors, naturopaths, etc)
I'd like to read something more definitive. Both for my own purposes, and also to point people to, as the category itself makes people skeptical.
Spicy food, sure, people get that. But potatoes? That's a weird one for most.
(I've had enough cases where I didn't realize something was a nightshade and I had a bad effect from it that I don't think I'm merely fooling myself, but the quality of articles about it is disturbing).
What did the rodent studies find?
Any book or yogashaala recommendation ?
Also hearing that there's nothing that can be done except watch your body deteriorate is a slap in the face to any one. What you're left with is trying the "unconventional".
This has been my experience since I started having systemic inflammatory symptoms since the age of 12.
It has wrecked my life in as literal and as figurative a way as one can imagine.
A lot of doctors blur the lines between their own hypotheses and facts. It's always "all in your head" until it isn't, but few ever admit they were wrong even after the facts come out.
Many also have such an ego that they prefer to concoct convoluted and implausible explanations for irregular test results and obvious symptoms rather than to concede that their prior implications about the patient's character (as being one who makes up symptoms) were unacceptable.
It would be more accurate to say, "We're not sure. We're sorry. We can't help you at this time." But instead they blame you? The person who brought them opportunity?
Science could stand a heavy dose of humility. No one trusts an egotistical bully.
Note: I'm not a Luddite. I think the scientific method is a great tool. It's enabled us to do wonderful things. But humans being human do make mistakes, there a false flags, etc. My rub, despite history, is there's a (false) belief that Science can do not wrong.
That disconnect - and the ongoing insistence it doesn't exit - only undermines Brand Science (if you will).
The irony is, there's plenty of Science to show how such denial is a mistake. It's as if Science won't listen to itself. But blames us for not listening? Huh?
It is the ideal playground for the lifestyle hacker.
i take your "beats me" doctors and raise you the gastroenterologist i saw recently - he said straight out, end of discussion, "our infectionist doesn't believe in candida in the gut"
As we have that saying in Russia - "the duty to save the drowning person lies solely with the drowning person" ("spasenie utopayuschih delo ruk samih utopayuschih")
You may be on to something. Many religions in times of prayer also have fasting and special diets. Such a large change in diet would influence gut bacteria and the person would attribute the change to their god.
0) https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbio...
Yes, but it usually works the other way around, i.e. the immune system should not recognise the "specific gluten protein" because it looks like self. After all the microbe(?) that produces it is trying to survive by looking like its host, it isn't trying to induce thyroiditis in its host.
Another common case is mimicry of the A, B blood antigens and the Rhesus factor. Patients that are AB+ treat A,B and Rhesus factor as self and so can accept blood from any donor (i.e. AB+ is the universal recipient). In contrast, O- patients who do not treat A,B and Rhesus factor as self and due to mimicry will likely treat them as foreign bad (as opposed to foreign neutral), so if they receive a transfusion from any other blood type the immune system will attack the transfusion. Since O- lacks A,B and Rhesus it is the universal donor.
> any suggestions where to start?
The topics fall under microbiology / immunology, so Ugrad textbooks, Wikipedia etc.
As the immune system matures in late fetal development, there's a stage when all cells that can target self antigens get killed. However, some tissues are isolated from the immune system, and so there are antigens there that don't get on the "self list". The thyroid is one of them.
Everything is OK until the thyroid gets damaged, infected or whatever. Then the immune system can see it, and may develop cell and antibody mediated responses.
Like all proteins in food, gluten is normally digested, and never makes it out of the gut intact. Only the component amino acids are transported to the bloodstream. However, in celiac disease, where the gut lining is damaged, I can imagine that some gluten gets across intact. Also many other proteins and complex carbohydrates.
Then the immune system could respond to all that stuff. And some of it could share epitope with thyroid components. So if there is an association between gluten and Hashimoto's thyroiditis, it's hard to say whether gluten shares epitopes with thyroid stuff, or whether it's just damaging the gut.