My hope is the US' next president will be one that cares deeply about civil rights and will start calling China out in the future, as its human rights abuses inevitably increase under a dictator with all-seeing surveillance eyes.
My hope is the US' next president will be one that cares deeply about civil rights and will start calling China out in the future, as its human rights abuses inevitably increase under a dictator with all-seeing surveillance eyes.
Good HN discussions on large, divisive topics are not generic but specific, and engage with the actual content of an article. More on this if anyone wants it: https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...
[1] http://english.gov.cn/archive/publications/2017/03/09/conten...
I believe that was said in jest during a speech at a charity dinner.
The part about having a President for Life in the US was definitely presented as a joke, though Trump's admiration of "strong" leaders has been a recurring sentiment.[The Atlantic]
[NR]: https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/donald-trump-xi-jinpi...
[CNN]: https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/03/politics/trump-maralago-remar...
[The Atlantic]: https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/554810/
You'll hear qualms about trade unfairness and the occasional blatant copyright/knockoff culture, but hardly ever any mention of human rights.
Trump really seems to have a hard on for wannabe dictators like Erdogan, Putin and now the Chinese guy. Hard to understand.
EDIT: Removal of previous question since posters have interpreted it as trolling (though I assure you, it was not).
Yes, yes it does. You don't have to be a saint to point out bad behavior.
Sure, but no one is making that claim.
Your second question suggests that one should recap decades of human rights abuses.
Finally, by stating "Not everything is a battle, you know", you seek to make it a battle when no one else is.
This is all classic troll behavior.