What could CNN possibly write about a company relating to their advertising on InfoWars content that would outweigh the very real $$ savings now that there are less competitors to advertise to InfoWars's massive audience?

This is good news for any firm who just wants as many people as possible to see their ads, and I suspect this consequentially won't mean any real loss (and potentially a gain as other firms rush to fill the void) for InfoWars.

The way I see it, CNN only managed to scare off these big firms because the specific employees who manage their Youtube advertising campaigns were scared the (very real) possibility of being fired because a nasty article might reflect badly on their firm and would "tarnish the brand" or some other such intangible reasoning.