German cars have the most to lose from a changing auto industry
economist.com
economist.com
Ok they arrogantly ignored the hybrid and EVs and focused only on ICE, but I believe they will quickly catch up, just look at the bmw i3 for example.
It is however true that the end of ICE will be a huge blow to their industry, with millions of people poised to lose their jobs. But that is the same for every country having a lot of carmakers.
In my opinion the only field where they will not be able to catch up are autonomous vehicle, it is too abstract and revolutionary for them. It does not fit the german way of innovation based on small incremental innovative steps.
If it comes to competing on software, I am not sure if they will be able to attract top talent.
That said there is still a lot of talent in the EU and it's only going to get better since the Brexit negotiations is going off the rails and companies are starting to relocate.
Germany isn't the best place to bootstrap a startup, but it has amazing universities and very established - and sophisticated - multinationals that train end employ a large number of incredibly talented people.
The question is, when will the circumstances change and how long will it take to reverse the damage that has been done?
Or for any country. Repair / maintenance jobs are a lot more than manufacturing
Remember that VW and Sony had a working prototype of an autonomous Passat around 2008, back then the computers required to make the calculations filled half the car.
I’m sure going from that step – having a prototype that works on highways and in simple situations – to the goal is just an iterative process, something they are good at.
And we’ve seen with other carmakers, which started by adding lane assistants, parking assistants, crash prevention systems that automatically brake, later ones that automatically drive around obstacles that you can gain autonomous capability by taking each part of driving, solving it seperately, and iterating on the combination.
This definitely isn't my field, but I'm at a loss to see where BMW, VW, &c. plan to purchase inputs once they start to scale ev manufacturing. The closest thing to a EU gigafactory isn't set to come online until 2023 (the Nortvolt in Sweden), and Europe isn't known (as far as I'm aware) for rare earth mining.
This is something that only rich (compared to the rest) people do in Europe. Most people never owned a brand new car and drive their cars up to 500k km and more (if the car allows it, nowadays it's not possible).
The average age of a passenger car in Germany is ~6.7 years. I wasn't able to find a recent reliable figure for the average number of KMs driven per car per year, but the EU has is listed at ~14,000 for Germany in 2012, and I don't really see why the number would have increased dramatically over the last five or so years.
Anyway, it looks like the average passenger car in Germany has been driven for ~87,000km. Germany is also on the lower side for average car age (France, and Italy are a little higher).
This is a back of the hand estimate, but it matches up with my perception that people look to replace their cars once they go above 100-150k km. Again, if you're younger, take longer commutes, or live outside of a large city (or are just frugal), I'm willing to bet that this number goes up dramatically (Eastern Europeans, for instance, hold onto their cars for a much longer period of time, and I wouldn't be surprised if this is also true for many portions of East Germany).
Keep in mind that scrap age is lowered by company cars and taxies which could easily clock 200'000km in few years.
From a US perspective that number is insanely low! The average age of a car in the US was 11.6 years in 2016.[1] The average US driver drives 13.5k miles (21.7 km) per year[2] so that means the average car in the US would have around 156k miles (251k km) on its clock.
I wonder if the German number is skewed lower because it's only measuring a relatively wealthy part of the EU. Do most used German cars simply get exported to less wealthy parts of the EU instead of being re-sold within Germany?
[1]http://www.autonews.com/article/20161122/RETAIL05/161129973/...
Perhaps they hire too many mechanical engineering graduates who simply do not know how to program. I find the main culprit being AUTOSAR, the flaming pile of shite should have never existed and should be taken out and shot.
I need to compose my thoughts more, as it is making me mad and is the main reason I am leaving the automotive industry - shockingly bad software, practices and utter incompetence when it comes to anything residing on the microcontroller. The electrical and mechanical designs are great, the software will eventually cause someone to die.
From my point of view a big problem is that most decisions are still made by people with mechanical or electrical engineering backgrounds. The whole culture values the German engineer a lot, the computer scientist or programmer not so much. I deliberately wrote computer scientist and programmer, because these are not even considered proper engineers here, even if the term software engineer is gaining popularity.
I suspect the situation is different for the big suppliers like Bosch, Conti and ZF. I think almost all of the ECU know-how (hardware and software) is in these companies whereas the car companies tend their - soon to be mostly useless - ICE know-how like the holy grail. If the suppliers make the right decisions now, they could be the big war profiteers.
BTW: ICE stands for internal combustion engine, for those just skimming the comments.
That is plain incorrect. Even though the exact details vary by state, pretty much anyone with a Bachelor's in Computer Science is an allowed to call themselves a proper "Ingenieur".
See for example Ingenieurgesetz (IngG) of the Baden-Württemberg state: http://www.landesrecht-bw.de/jportal/portal/t/ox2/page/bsbaw...
What I said and what I stand by is that in my experience the typical German automotive middle manager still has the words Dipl.-Ing. on his degree certificate and looks down on anyone who hasn't, including computer scientists.
And just to make clear where I am coming from, making all this claims: I do have a degree certificate with words Dipl.-Ing. on it and another one with the words Master and Informatics on it, so I know a bit of both worlds.
When it comes to the IngG, even there it is not as clearly cut as it seems. The whole history of it is interesting but too involved for a short comment, so I will focus on the wording of the law:
The law is very specific about the fact that it permits the title "Ingenieur" only to graduates of technical or natural scientific fields. Computer science, like mathematics, is considered a formal science which is neither technical nor a natural science.
Let me guess, your degree was actually in Computer Science and is "mistranslated" as Informatics by your University?
Informatics degrees[1] actually exist in the US and are different from Computer Science degrees[2].
[1] https://ischool.uw.edu/programs/informatics
[2] https://www.cs.washington.edu/academics/ugrad/courses/requir...
Ed. (1) by the poster
At least in the case of BW, Computer Science is clearly listed as one of the possible fields: "[...] wobei dieses Studium überwiegend von den Bereichen Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaften und Technik geprägt sein muss [...]"
"dieses" refers to "Studium in einer technischen oder naturwissenschaftlichen Fachrichtung" which means only technical or natural scientific fields qualify.
From my understanding Bioinformatics would qualify, because it could be considered a natural science and the learning content is dominated by topics from the natural sciences, computer science and technology.
Pure computer science would not qualify because it is neither a natural science nor technical. It does not qualify because it doesn't satisfy the precondition to the sentence you quoted.
I'm not a lawyer and this is just my reading of the law and I didn't find any court decisions or anything regarding this topic.
A very strange version of agile, that is. One where the very first section of the agile process description elaborates how important processes are and how important it is that everyone "lives" them. Reading this made me smile, because first sentence of the original Agile Manifesto literally is "Individuals and interactions over processes and tools".
No idea how that reflects on software they develop internally or for their cars but to me they care a lot about the software they have.
I find this worrying.
Having worked on a variety of BMW projects over the years, I find their dedication to software quality... worthy of improvement.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHXi7Bvi_gE
The components are good to go, it is up to the car manufacturers to start using this kit in their vehicles.
So where are these car manufacturers?
You can buy the whole drivetrain and electronics from Bosch, put it in a box with some seats in it and the job is done. Despite this relative ease it seems that we are not getting that out of the German auto manufacturers. It is lip service, a promise to have EV everything by year 202x as another 6.3 litre AMG G-Wagen with upgraded fluffy heated seats is launched.
I think a lot will have to wait for the baby boomer generation to die off or get too old to be safe on the autobahns any more. I don't believe that future generations will be pleasuring themselves at the sound of V-whatever engines with noisy exhaust notes in the way that mid-life crisis types do today (as they 'sit in traffic' in their 'ultimate driving machines'). These things will go the way of steam engines on railways. We were once romantically attached to steam trains in much the same way that today's frustrated old people are attached to the fake exhaust notes on their Porsche/AMG/BMW/Audi cars.
One good thing is that today's high end cars are not built to last. Sure all the corrosion proofing is better than it was in 1963 but the financing of cars and the fact that you can't fix them yourself means that they get scrapped soon after they make it onto the second hand market. Why pay $$$$ to get that gearbox replaced when you can just lease-hire a brand new car for $$$ a month?
Bosch and others are doing great things in the pedal powered electric bicycle market. If you are a bicycle manufacturer then you just need to bolt the Bosch bits to a slightly modified bike and the job is a good one. The barrier to entry is really quite low, hence the profusion of electric bicycle models. It will be funny if the same happens with EV cars, with new market players from China coming along to make easy what VW et al. struggle to do.
I do feel that the German auto industry is in better shape for the EV challenge than what is happening in Italy and France. For instance, the PSA group - Peugeot/Citroen - recently brought out some monster SUV under a new deluxe brand - 'DS' - and that has a big clunky diesel in it, not some hybrid or EV. They are playing catch up with the German brands, trying to go high end, but you know that these stillborn dinosaurs are never going to be seen on the roads. PSA also got burdened with the GM Opel/Vauxhall relics. Meanwhile in Italy the Fiat group burdened themselves with all of that Chrysler legacy cruft. So at least the German auto industry is going forward.
In both 2015 and 2016, the Renault Zoe was the second best-selling European plug-in car, and quite close to the BMW i3.
For industrial uses (e.g. mining) the likes of Bosch Automation are world leaders.
Audi has just release the worlds first L4 consumer car.
DHL/Deutsche Post are piloting their fleet of autonomous delivery vehicles and there are many more examples.
If anything who is currently falling behind in the autonomous vehicle industry is the likes of Tesla that promised the world on hardware that could never achieve that and still thinks it can achieve L4/5 all conditions driver with a single sensor on hardware that is designed to for limited L3 functionality.
To answer the question, see cageface’s comment.
I can't speak for others, but here are a few reasons I would never move to the US for work. Note that I visited the US multiple times (alas in the 90s) so I'm aware that it's a very diverse country with very diverse (and usually incredibly nice) people and it's not the usual anti-US reflexes that would keep me from working there, ever.
Let's begin with the fact that you don't get any vacation by law. Some companies will not even provide you with sick days, which is a completely absurd from a European perspective
Let's continue with the fact that employment laws in most states are extremely pro-business and very much anti employee. Agreements like mandatory arbitration and no right to an impartial judge in case of disputes would be laughed out of any European court. At least it would be laughed out of any court in Switzerland, which has one of the most liberal and lenient employment laws in Europe.
Let's continue with things that would be simply extremely uncomfortable for me. While I'm aware that not every American is armed to the teeth there are enough people packing heat, especially in southern states. With measures on the way to allow a carrier of a concealed gun to carry it throughout any state makes me extremely uncomfortable and I really don't want to live in such a society.
We could continue with cities which are basically designed for cars, not walkable, not pedestrian and bike friendly and with horrendous public transport options. Sure, there are an excpetions (actually I can only think of New York from the cities I know). I don't want to live in a city where I'm either dependent on a car or on the likes of Uber.
You imply that money is the main motivator. It's not to me. As long as I have a satisfying job and make enough money to cover my daily needs (and maybe allows me to order a craft beer instead of the general swill without having to think about it) I'm more than happy. I make enough money to have no debts, being able to afford my travels (to Japan in April for a month) and if I can afford those things that make life a pleasure to live I'm happy enough.
Too each his own, I guess. But I vehemently disagree with your premise that money is the main motivator for going to work.
In my opinion, this is precisely their problem though: they are increasingly becoming software companies with sort of a mechanical engineering appendage, but they haven't realised yet.
> it is them who introduced computer controlled engine (motronic) or invented ABS and ESP which are computer controlled brakes.
Yes, but those are relatively "classic" devices: straight-forward control of narrowly-defined and well-defined physical systems. Essentially an iteration on analog control systems.
In fact your argument strengthens mine, IMO: you seem not to have realised either how tremendous the difference is between good old ABS and a modern vehicle (and inter-vehicle, etc) network.
No doubt German manufacturers can catch up quickly: but only if they realise this paradigm shift, and react to it. So far, I see no signs of that.
Fellow German automotive embedded engineer here, BTW. I've seen how the sausage gets made.
Anectdata:
* the last BMW project I worked on, they had very tenuous control of their in-car network, with lots of race conditions, gaps, etc. And couldn't seem to get it under control
* speaking of race conditions: there is one in my BMW. In the gear selector! (yes, you read right -- a race condition in the gear selector)
* the BMW Android app (which cost €300, including the preparations within the car) is laughably unreliable; it's frequently unavailable, likes to present incorrect data, and the UX is designed by clueless people. Most free apps are better. At least they are consistent: despite frequent updates, it remains shit
We also mostly drive stick here.
I think the jury is still out if cleaner car technology will actually win or if we will keep living in poisoned cities.
Maybe German car makers will come out ahead by focusing on strong, loud and polluting cars.
I sure hope they won't.
Toyota has put themselves in a similar running from behind scenario, because their leadership chose to put a lot of effort and money into hydrogen instead of the lithium-ion approach. I'd bet on them similarly eventually throwing immense resources into catching up.
During last years, there was a huge push to change that and sell as much as possible new cars with automatic transmission. For example, nowadays it is almost impossible to get a car with manual transmission, 4x4, and not an anaemic, preferably petrol engine (forget about atmospheric one). If you accept automatic, you can choose from almost all brands.
You can buy 2.0 TDi Skoda with manual (consider they have different offerings across Europe).
Btw this is a quote from my Italian driving instructor at the time
This is not true. The German car industry is heavily investing in electric cars.
Source: friend is engineering manager for a major supplier
BMW was one of the first to come out with electric cars with the "i series". Audi is releasing 3 new electric drivetrains under the e-tron branding. Mercedes had a massive news release last month where they are building a global battery news to go with an upcoming global rollout of new electric cars:
https://electrek.co/2018/01/29/mercedes-benz-electric-vehicl...
This idea that the top auto manufacturers are just sitting around waiting for their industry to be taken over by electric startups is just laughable.
That was one car. A single model - the i3. The i8 does not count since it's a hybrid with a little lawnmower engine hidden inside.
I am hopeful that things can change but what I see from BMW and (especially) Volvo is the same old press releases about a concept car that will be available three years from now.
They just keep writing the same press releases but shifting the dates forward.
* There is a real anti-diesel sentiment, and diesel phasing out will happen
* Electric vehicles are an upcoming reality
* Driverless vehicles are desirable and will dominate the market
And finally,
* The German auto industry is unprepared to deal with these facts
Honestly I completely disagree on all 4 points. Electric vehicles are and will remain very expensive and inconvenient for a while. Their post-subsidy prices make clear that they constitute tax-funded toys for the rich. Autonomous/Driverless vehicles are also a novelty that we'll pay with a lot of blood. It's clear that we'll need at least 1-2 decades to reach a point where you can place reasonable trust to such a system for your daily commute. As for the diesel problem, there is a chance that some environmentalist lobby will eventually cause diesel cars for personal use to be phased out, but right now it's more of a social media meme than anything. And just because German automakers cheat on their tests, it doesn't mean that everyone else does too.
And finally, be certain that those massive corporate giants take consumer trends very seriously, and they're already trailing just behind the bleeding edge on all those technologies. They just don't spend that much on PR because they don't need more capital.
Germans, especially Audi, need to hardware condom media system writes to the CAN bus and cordon off sides of the driver dash into separate screens the media system can't spoof writes onto.
Previously on hn: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16375534
However:
Do you live alone? If no, how do you do your shopping, for example? Do you have kids? If yes, how do you transport them?
And this comes from someone who enjoys driving.
It’s easy to forget if you live in the centre of the capital city of course.
That said, I know many people who only use them occasionally. Gas is expensive here.
Where do you park your car? On the street, in a designated parking zone, which happens to be a five to ten minute walk from where you live (because the handful of spots closer to your apartment are already taken).
Where do you wash your car? Not in your driveway (because you don't have one) or on the street in front of your apartment, because that's - quite frankly - illegal. So, you have to take it to a car wash, which is inconvenient.
Car inspections... well, on that, I can only speak for Germany and Switzerland. In our case, the engine bay and undercarriage needs to be thoroughly washed before going for an inspection, any sign of rust is an automatic failure, and the criteria overall are much stricter than in the US and UK.
America (or even just suburban America) and other car-friendly Anglo-Saxon countries are more of an exception than a fair representation of how the average person relates to owning and driving a car.
However, the people who consider that hurdle are usually young people, living alone. Their focus now is to enjoy the life, travel, socialising, etc.
In a few years, they will have partner, kids, and they will find out, that the car saves them a lot of time. It they can do in 10 minutes, what used to take 45? Sure, bring it on. That's exactly the reason why I and my similarly aged friends got the cars: the day has only 24 hours, and compared to that, car-related costs are only an expense, and quite a small ones in the bigger scheme of things.
I live in Europe, though.
https://www.amazon.de/Andersen-Royal-Shopper-Wismar-schwarz/...
It's also very common to have a reusable shopping bag in your everyday carry, and/or to carry your groceries in your backpack.
Nowadays, we do weekly shopping. No way I would do that with public transport.
Most people in Germany don't have a garage. Apart from that: the other part of the question is "where do I park my car when I'm not at home?", which is about 50% of the time. Inner cities in Germany don't have giant parking spots but narrow streets with parallel parking on the street with parking fees.
At work; we have a parking lot. When visiting business partners, they have visitor parking. Shops also do have parking. Even the small gym that I visit has a parking lot (small one, but they don't want to lose customers after all). There are not many reasons to go to inner city, just for pubs. And there's no way you can go to pub and then drive anyway. All the small shops disappeared from the city centre years ago, because the patrons had a problem getting there. If you want the cheapest, but still clean and representable office space, you go into the city centre, into the pedestrian zone. Just don't expect many visits there, or even a fast internet connection for your office.
Yes, I do live in Europe. Not in DE, though.
Luckily in Germany there are quite a lot pedestrian zones ("Fußgängerzonen") for shopping where motorized vehicles aren't even allowed and small businesses can thrive there. Cars have to park somewhere else and this can often become a problem. Parking is also quite expensive in major cities with parking fees up to 3€/hour. Building more parking lots into the inner cities is impossible and the fees are high to keep people moving.
> Shops also do have parking.
In Germany malls aren't very common. Inner cities are mostly mixed business and residential with shops on the lowest floor and apartments above.
In cities, almost everything is faster by bike than by car. European cities are very dense, parking space is scarce and many inner cities are car-free.
Public transport infrastructure is great and while people like to complain about Deutsche Bahn (the railway company), it's still more predictable and comfortable than driving a car.
Oh, and did I mention how much money it saves not to own a car?
Yap. So true
re: the saving money buy not owning a car yes I am sure all the commuters to London would like to live in central London housing is still more expensive than a car
If I would be sure that I will not move back to home country I would probably look to sell the car.
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_vehicles_...
You asked this question on HN, which probably has a youger than median audience, which tends to value computers over cars and tends to work in tech related industries, living in cities. These answer are not representative of Germany in any way.