If Node was in its infancy when the io.js fork happened, then Elm is downright fetal. I don't think you can compare them.
It seems to me that the extreme BDFL governance of Elm is also its strong point at the expense of being then limited to that bandwidth, it's weak point.
Unfortunately, delegating work does not come for free and a great deal of energy will be burned in people management. Unless you're clairvoyant, it can't be said whether that would be any better for Elm or mire it in an even thicker mud.
Elm has a lot of unknowns that someone has to sit down and make decisions about because it wants to generalize over environments beyond browser-side Javascript. I think that sits at the root of why you can't just delegate out core contributor access.
But trying to do that generalization in the first place is also why Elm has some really interesting potential in the long run than just another SPA abstraction.