HP and Hynix - Bringing the Memristor to Market in Next-Generation Memory
h30507.www3.hp.com
h30507.www3.hp.com
One of the patent awardees, Blaise Motett, seems to have a different view of HP's memristor, namely that their sr is not actually one. http://www.slideshare.net/blaisemouttet/mythical-memristor
I've read that memristor technology can be used both for memory and for processing; does that imply both?
If there is just one fabrication process that builds a "memristor chip", and fpga-like systems can be built where memory can be converted into processing power, and back into memory freely, then this is by far the most revolutionary technology advance I've witnessed in my life.
If not, it's still neat for many reasons - but I haven't ever seen clarification on this. Even if it's not being done in this batch or with this fab process, would it be possible/not stupid hard to do, after some investment?
What work has to be done that takes that many years? I'm genuinely curious why bringing something to market takes so long. What are the tasks involved? What are the labor and time-intensive points?
The first successful devices are usually the result of a more finicky and expensive set of processes. Also, all the fabrication steps have been ordered, and if necessary had their process parameters pushed out of otherwise optimal zones for the machines in question, to make the desired device come out right. So, after making the first ones they had to find a way to make them with better, commercially viable, yields. Also they had to develop a process flow to make memristors at the same time as, or at least compatible with, the other steps needed for the other devices that will be needed on a marketable chip. It is common to push necessary support circuitry for a device off the initial test wafers (if for nothing else, it helps reduce the variables, if the devices don't appear to work, was it the new device under test or the amp you put right next to it on the chip; better to put another test device in that space, have two to test, and use an off chip amp to test them).
In addition, there may have been issues with the materials used or waste products produced. You can play around with small amounts of more expensive materials in research. Similarly, disposing of small amounts of very nasty waste products can be fine on the research scale, but dealing with the amounts produced after scaling production up might make the venture unprofitable.
Also, many of the process steps may have been far more "hands on" than mass production demands. So all of those have to be automated and process parameters for them optimized.
All of this is based on academic research experience, which, afaik, doesn't constrain itself as much to sticking as close as possible to the established tools as industry research might. But with a whole new class of devices like this, I imagine even an industry research group wouldn't let a little thing like lack of an established, trustworthy tool for a job stand in the way of a promising avenue toward success. I'd say six years is doing very well considering all these issues and many of them are probably still in the process of being ironed out.
OMAP4, PixelQi, and now memristors? Can't wait to see the convergence of these three.
Now we just need a miracle in energy storage technology for a perfect storm.