Johns Hopkins study suggests medical errors are 3rd-leading cause of death in US
hub.jhu.edu
hub.jhu.edu
>could include a doctor prescribing a treatment that is successful for 99.9999% of patients
Sure it could, but that is an edge case that would account for a negligible number of deaths in relation to the sum total.
Dr Harry Persaud of Ohio made more than $7m from health insurance fraud while abusing patients’ ‘sacred trust’, says FBI
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/dec/22/doctor-who-o...
Moreland Hills doctors performed unnecessary tests, illegally prescribed drugs, feds say
http://www.cleveland.com/court-justice/index.ssf/2018/01/mor...
The $395 billion US pharmaceutical industry spent $5.2 billion on advertising prescription drugs directly to consumers in 2015
Every $1.00 spent advertising prescription drugs is estimated to increase their retail sales by $4.20
https://prescriptiondrugs.procon.org
Doctors received more than $46 million from drug companies marketing opioids
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/08/0...
You'd think your primary care physician would know what medications you are on, and what specialists you'd seen, but they don't work like that unless you laboriously tell them everything you received when they weren't staring at you. It's inefficient to say the least. And it's borderline negligent too.
Excessive medical care is why the upper middle class have longer life expectancies than the super wealthy.