It's FUD, let me explain: before the coming of pluggable transports it was easy to distinguish Tor traffic from TLS, which made blocking by censors (like China and Iran) easy since they didn't need to find all bridges addresses but could instead fingerprint Tor traffic to block it.
As you can see from the documents Dr. Steven Murdoch outlined a roadmap for working on that, since that item ("TLS Normalization") was one of the deliverables for the sponsor
> One of the Oct 1 deliverables is a roadmap for TLS normalization. I have a draft of this for your preusal
Where's the problem in this? Mr. Yasha interprets this as meaning "They reported to the spooky agents security vulnerability!" when the fact that Tor traffic doesn't look like TLS was a known problem to everyone that had the slightest knowledge on how Tor works. Now can anyone explain how this isn't deliberate FUD spreading and an insult to the very people who were working on making Tor more censorship resistant, i.e. Dr. Steven Murdoch and Dr. Roger Dingledine? (FWIW I talked to Roger on irc once and he was very offended by the smears that were spread by Pando like this one)