From what you posted:
> ART ON THIS PLANET HAS BEEN HIJACKED BY ROTHSCHILD COMMIES AND ZIONISTS . .
That's not "a diff perspective", that's anti-semitism. Please don't post anti-semite stuff here...
> ART ON THIS PLANET HAS BEEN HIJACKED BY ROTHSCHILD COMMIES AND ZIONISTS . .
That's not "a diff perspective", that's anti-semitism. Please don't post anti-semite stuff here...
I met them yesterday with the vegan nazis and the irredentist panafricanists - but you don't hang out at the cool parties !
Close enough? Really don't see that hijacking art any time soon though.
In the context of an alleged "art hijacking", I say it doesn't matter at all.
Of course for every Zionist that was socialist, there was another that was ant-communist, and for every communist that was Jewish there were many more that were anti-semitic. But don't let that stop the conspiracy nuts.
But it seems clear that modern art has turned into a speculative multi-million dollar business, so "Rothschild" doesn't seem out of place, with them being the most know financial capitalist family.
And since the artists themselves tend to lean on the left and extreme-left of the political spectrum, "communist" doesn't seem an inept term either.
They're not all called Rothschild either, that's not really the point.
> Is that being implied in the post?
No. The post is using standard euphemisms for Jews that are commonly used in anti-semitic literature.
In any case, my point is that "zionist" isn't a euphemism for "Jew" or "Jewish". It describes a specific political (at least) ideology - which has radical, extremist militants.
"Zionist" cannot be anti-semite unless one believes all Jewish persons are zionists.
I understand why radical zionists would want to pass that on as true, but it's not.
Many Jewish people oppose Zionism on political, humanitarian and religious grounds.
Yes it is. It doesn't literally mean Jewish but it absolutely is used as a euphemism for Jewish.
It's usually easy to tell the difference. If it's being used in the context of the social and political events leading up to the establishment of the state of Israel then it's likely to be the literal meaning.
If it's being used in almost any modern context, but especially in the context of conspiracies, secrets or money, then it's very likely to be euphemistic. And anti-semitic.