> IBM isn't a successful technology company with a proven record building good products.
Whoa, what? Sure, some of their achievements are in their past, but that claim really overlooks a ton of history.
Whoa, what? Sure, some of their achievements are in their past, but that claim really overlooks a ton of history.
If they want the benefits of sharing that brand between operations then they deserve the negatives that come along with it.
When their other ships were going down, they shifted to a growing area of demand, not an area of their expertise. A brand shell game.