From the linked wikipedia article:
"It broadly rejects egalitarianism and the view that history shows inevitable progression towards greater liberty and enlightenment (thus, it is in part a reaction against "Whig historiography").[1][2] The movement favors a return to older societal constructs and forms of government, including support for monarchism or other forms of strong, centralised leadership such as a "neocameralist CEO"[3] of a joint-stock republic,[4] coupled with a right-libertarian, conservative or other approach to economics."
How much of this "neo-feudalism" shares with actual feudalism is not clear to me.
See
https://www.thedailybeast.com/californias-new-feudalism-bene...
https://www.nationalreview.com/2014/07/new-feudalism-fred-ba...
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-w-whitehead/the-age-of-n...