They don't just speedy delete articles about music groups, they have a dedicated template for it. As per CSD A7.
I don't see why a page about music group would be "obviously inappropriate". Maybe you will care to explain?
I know, because I've done both.
How about "2013 Richmond Raiders season"? Apparently this is more encyclopedic? There are no specialized sites for this?
I would say you did not carry your point across.
> How about "2013 Richmond Raiders season"? Apparently this is more encyclopedic? There are no specialized sites for this?
No I'm not, I just choose to ignore sportsfandom.
You choose to ignore sportsfandom, but apparently it gets out of jail free card on Wikipedia. Is it a good thing? Why? Where's the motivation? Who decided that?
no it does not. These artist articles are created in subpar condition and left to rot, most of the creators not coming back, in the extreme case but often enough. There's certainly a bunch of obscure artists, say death metal bands ... and on the other hand my local low league team doesn't have a page. The proportions you are comparing are quite different.
> Where's the motivation? Who decided that?
there's a thing or two to say about comercialization, I'll give you that.