Gotta appreciate the update - not many vendors would do that. It's also a shame that very few independent sources do thorough comparisons like these... I mean comparisons below the Gartner enterprise analysis level.
Also interesting to see that arangodb still performs better than Neo4J in typical graph scenarios, despite the attacks in another threat by the Neo folks.
Just followed up on the previous benchmark results. Yes, vendor benchmark etc., but it is nice to see how honest and transparent these guys are. Will be playing around with arangodb soon.
Jan from ArangoDB here... true, and we know that it is a thin line to publish benchmark results when you're a vendor. But hope to at least provide a boilerplate for own tests and show that just because a db is multi-model, doesn't mean it has to be slow
Kudos. I am more of a relational world kinda guy, but good work.