Is that 1. End user, 2. Content provider (e.g. “fast lanes” for Netflix), and 3. Government subsidies?
It's better to be Aramco, Exxon or Shell than Baker Hughes or Schlumberger. Much less a lowely oil equipment maker (the shovel makers).
It's better to be the railroad (BNSF, etc) than the car maker (eg Greenbrier), or really any other rail equipment maker.
Better to be the largest natural gas companies, than the fracking sand provider (eg U.S. Silica), or the natural gas equipment makers.
It's better to be Glencore, BHP Biliton or Rio Tinto than the company that makes the mining equipment.
It's better to be DeBeers than a diamond jewelry equipment maker.
It's better to be Pfizer or Merck than a company making various equipment for big pharma.
It's better to be Intel than Applied Materials.
It's better to be Apple or Samsung than Foxconn or most any component maker.
It's better to be BMW, Toyota or Telsa than a parts supplier.
At this point, every scheming hustler is in the market for a bit coin miner. Same in a gold rush -- any fool can dig with a shovel. It's not until boredom or consolidation happens that the shovel maker margins start getting thinner.
Comparing crypto mining to a war is unnecessarily evokative and manipulative.