Also, Apple maps in my area has been quietly, but steadily improving. Still not as many POIs as Google, but nicer interface and turn-by-turn (IMO).
Also, Apple maps in my area has been quietly, but steadily improving. Still not as many POIs as Google, but nicer interface and turn-by-turn (IMO).
Wade it is. Yes the chat function is largely useless the report incident function is cool!
Are you sure? Someone just did an interesting analysis (admittedly, very small data space but a long-term test), found that Waze claims faster routes than they typically achieve.
Update: Ah, @dogecoinbase linked to it: https://arturrr.com/2018/02/19/navigation-apps/
Zurich Switzerland -> Austrian Alps
Heavy traffic, incidents along the road, gridlock ...> Waze got us there FASTEST.
"ATTENTION" "WAZE HAS JUST FOUND A FASTER ROUTE".
Competed against iPhone & Google Maps.
Same way return drive. ... So two data points I guess.
Austrian Alps -> Zurich
Plus ... I use it daily... So three data points then.
I've experienced something interesting a few times in high-traffic situations (closed highways/etc) where byways produce time estimates which are instantly implausible as many people attempt to take them. It's interesting to think of methods Waze could use to predict optimal paths while accounting for its own effect on traffic.