Ask HN: With Microsoft’s release of Q#, what’s the future of quantum computing? | Hacker News Reader

Ask HN: With Microsoft’s release of Q#, what’s the future of quantum computing?

42 pointsVinay666620 comments

Whats the future of Quantum Computing. Can any software engineer start his career in Quantum computing? What does it take to train in this technology?

View on HN

Quantum computing is not yet territory for engineers. So far only the most rudimentary devices are being built, although IBM is wasting no time in their attempts to confuse as many people as possible with their PR. Quantum computer research is a reasonable field to try to get in to, but of course it's inside of academia (so you'd have to go back to school for that career change.)

Among researchers there remains some concern that no practical quantum computer will ever be built. The concerns are centered around practical limits in error correction (analogous to circuit noise). So, while now is a great time to be writing PR pieces about it, and an OK time to be researching it, it's a pretty bad time to be trying to engineer with it.

Here's Scott Aaronson, the most famous quantum information theory person there is: https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/

I am not even sure how one can have a consumer level quantum computer (e.g. desktop, laptop, mobile device) at all. The physics behind a quantum computer doesn't seem to allow such consumer devices ever possible for a true QC. Our surrounding is full of interference. Of course, never say never right? I am just skeptical I guess.

They aren't meant to be consumer devices, and in fact can perform worse than a classical computer for most everyday tasks that are sequential, like loading a webpage. What they are good it is simulating outcomes, since a qubit can be in more than just 0 | 1 states.

That's why quantum computers would be good at breaking crypto, running risk simulations for business, AI/ML, etc and not sequential tasks like most consumer devices are meant for.

What about gaming?

I don't think anybody would have forseen that the primary use of massively parallel processors would be playing video games. I wouldn't be surprised if quantum turns out to work, that graphics programmers find a use for them.

This is one of the rare instances where I would say a cloud service makes sense. You're bulky, expensive, highly specialized quantum computer sits in a data center and consumers connect to it as needed.

I listened to this [0] podcast a few days ago and that is one of the things said - it's not practical to try and put a quantum chip in every desktop/PC, but a Quantum computing service in Azure is the endgame. Right now only a simulation is offered, but the idea is that when a real Quantum service is offered, the same code that runs in the simulator can run on the Quantum service.

[0] https://www.hanselminutes.com/618/quantum-computing-detangle...

if it's not in the territory for engineers, who's designing and building the quantum computers, and coming up with solutions to these noise problems?

I think at this stage, it's scientists designing and building them. Some scientists have a lot of overlapping skills with engineering, but it's not really the same thing.

Everything I know about quantum computing I learned from Scott's comic: https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/the-talk-3

Link to the project page at least. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/quantum/?view=qsharp-previe...

https://artofengineer.com/articles/technology/introduction-t...

That post has an easy to understand explanation.

I think, there's too few positions for quantum software engineers taking into account that there're so few quantum computers. There're more people willing to work with quantum computers, than open positions. In 10 or 20 years there might be more positions, but until quantum computers become more affordable, there will be no mass employment in this profession.

It's always nice to learn new things, though, so I highly recommend learning about quantum computing and quantum mechanics. These are fascinating subjects.

>taking into account that there're so few quantum computers

It has not yet been demonstrated that there are any quantum computers, beyond test rigs that aren't better than classical ones.

So, they are quantum computers, they just aren't powerful enough for your liking.

Saying that "there are no better-than-classical" quantum computers is analogous to saying that no fusion reactor has ever been run at over-unity: an observation of a success metric that is easy to keep track of, necessary to obtain, and as it seems very difficult to actually flip.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-era-of-quantum-computing-...

What? Yes there have! The Innsbruck machines, for example.

Here is more info about the QDK (seems to be from December 2017): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7b4J2INq9c

I’m a beginner. So I dont think so that the new programming language makes a perfect spot for developer. They goes for the old one which are already popular from last long years.

The actual question here is how do you both specify a URL and add text to a HN post.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com