Inside the Russian Troll Factory: Zombies and a Breakneck Pace
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Twice, I've followed the trail of stories which were either false or misleading, and both times they led to Irish journalists who definitely seem to be real people.
Both of them almost exclusively tweet about Russian issues and are 100% pro-Russian on absolutely any issue. You can go down their Twitters and you won't find a mention of corruption, political failings, doping or anything else negative.
and
https://twitter.com/DanielleRyanJ
I really don't know what to think here. Obviously there are contrarians on any issue, and journalism is tough to get ahead in - if RT are going to pay your salary then people could be tempted into a pro-Russian leaning - but to be completely polemic in your views. I just find it suspicious.
[Edit: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/398857-hungary-orban-media-dictator... here was the article that Danielle Ryan wrote about Hungary in Russia Today. I don't know a single person in Hungary who would agree with what she writes there. Not even among Hungarians who actually voted for Orban, nevermind among expats. The Hungarian government has posters up right now warning voters that the EU wants to "install millions from Africa and the Middle East." It's racist fear-mongering in the extreme and universally condemned. But somehow we've got an Irish girl throwing her weight behind the government while paid for by Russia?]
I think this has already rendered Twitter especially useless as a barometer of public opinion, it is really a barometer of bot activity for the most part when it comes to politics (I'm thinking of the #ReleaseTheMemo stuff.)
I am not sure how resilient Facebook is to bots, or if it is heading down the road that Twitter has taken.
The rise of bots really destroys what was developing as a means of mass empowerment. Basically any political movement (such as the Arab spring) that starts on Twitter or Facebook now you have to suspect is being run by influence agents, rather than real people.