How Toothpaste Became a Mainstream Product
capitalandgrowth.org
capitalandgrowth.org
> The most famous and widespread case of a successful habit change is perhaps the 12-step Alcoholics Anonymous program
It's a reach to call it a "successful habit change" given that actual study show a success rate of less than 3%.
> We also know that we all have a limited supply of willpower.
Actually it looks like that isn't the case after all.
Etc.
> Actually it looks like that isn't the case after all.
Huh? You mean you've read an article, or there are several independent studies showing what you say?
I really doubt that this would be untrue because I can apply it to my life and it makes things better.
He is pointing to the fact that the studies that originated the "willpower pool" hypothesis have been increasingly discredited.
Like most things the true is probably somewhere in between and the effect is probably there, just not as strong as the original publication implied. Sprinkle a bit of placebo effect on top of that and that could lead to people (e.g. you) using the concept of ego depletion with a lot of success.
Is that true? I think the outermost layer of a tooth is just enamel. Open to being wrong (not a dentist) but I think it somewhat detracts from credibility (even though toothpaste is not actually the thrust of the article).
Namely, what toothpaste is, how it works, and the prevailing clues offered as bellwethers for its effectiveness as a preventative treatment.
This is the story of how to make something happen, whether it's useful and valuable to the individual or not. I'd rather see that story prefaced or intermingled with the details of a product's true utility, before hearing about the complicated and concerted effort to bring such a product to market (warts and all). I don't feel that such details are beyond the scope of a story of commercial success. Far from it. The mechanics of genuine utility are of paramount relevance, at least eye-to-eye with the behind-the-scenes schmoozings of success.
Missing from the story are the odd details that reveal flouride's role in dental health, and its hazards and side effects as a medication. Also missing, is the detail regarding the industrial scale source of flouride's precursors, glossed over, even with the mention of at least one aluminum company, and hints implying a nod to the war effort, prior to the start of the second world war.
It's also short on specific dates, skipping across broad periods, mentioning mostly decades as eras of activity or progress.
Flouride and dentistry are weird topics with a lot of trivia, but this article only explains the activities of businessmen operating from advantageous positions, which for the most part, given the hindsight of the article lend an almost obvious and deterministic view of the outcome of their success. It reads like the musings of an amateur hunter relishing the idea of a canned hunt.
Without including the low-level hard science of why toothpaste is effective, this story casts toothpaste in a role as seemingly empty as perhaps the Juicero juicer [0], or any number of other hollow products sold via infommercial or trumpeted alongside buzz words like Internet of Things.
And of course there’s the politicized paranoia of contaminating the public water supply, and who should get to decide such things, and why they might choose to do it.
But, those stories usually focus on intrigue, and don’t explain much about the chemistry of the element flourine, ionic compounds, or much of anything else, and dissolve into hand-wavey boogie men.
You basically get two incomplete pictures of the same story. What both sides leave out is that flouride has medical utility, but while toxicity is a potential risk, it’s not some mysterious subversive threat, and the benefits weigh favorably against the side effects.
Also, no one ever tells you that a little bit won’t hurt. Opponents offer hysterics of zero tolerance for poisonous toxic waste and brain damage. See also, Dr. Strangelove, and the idea of precious bodily fluids.
Meanwhile, advocates never tell you that you might be okay with flouride toothpaste just once a week, and no flouride at all the rest of the week, brushing with just pure, ordinary water (Mandrake). Instead, advocates advise twice a day, ...no more, but certainly no less.
And proponents of public flouridated water usually sidestep the premise of prescriptive public health as offering a leg up to people who might not have disposable income for toothpaste. Charity chafes all sides. Some might be too proud to accept the premise of assistance. Others bristling at the undertones of that idea amounting to other people’s needs conflicting with the autonomy of those with the capacity for choice between such options.
If you don't need fluoride, even water works well:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27513809
"The cumulative evidence for this systematic review demonstrates that there is moderate certainty that toothbrushing with a dentifrice does not provide an added effect for the mechanical removal of dental plaque."
The science is pretty basic. CaCO3 powder made into a paste form provides a source of calcium and alkalinity - protecting the teeth from acid created by bacteria. The rest is marketing. The effective way to deliver flouride is a higher concentration that only touches your teeth, which is how it is used at the dentist after a cleaning.
If toothpaste's success was based on utility there would be brands offering probiotic paste that colonizes your mouth and uses glucose with out making biofilms or having acid as an end product of metabolism. Then you wouldn't even really need to constantly brush your teeth or buy more toothpaste. The maximum utility product would cost a lot to develop and ruin the business model.
This is why toothpaste’s marketing relies heavily on peer pressure and establishing trust in habitual use. Habitual use also carries the obviously juicy benefit of boosting volume and revenue.
You should have seen the "shall I tell him he has body odour?" ads that the soap manufacturers ran a few decades ago.
Big score, there's deodorant as a life necessity installed in the common mind.
Not a complaint, I just think that soap makers are the unacknowledged legislators of the world.
This might sounds too low-tech (and can't be patented), but simple nasal irrigation with a lukewarm isotonic saline solution works pretty well for me in this department.
In terms of building habits and routines, I think the trouble with nasal irrigation is that it takes too much work to prep the water. I do it during allergy season, but only because my hay fever is bad enough that the relief is a big help. If you want people to make a habit out of it in the absence of having their sinuses assaulted by trees, it would be good if there was a way to have water for your neti pot as easily available as toothpaste is.
You'd need a gizmo that can quickly and easily take an adequate quantity of water, sanitize it, bring it to temperature, and add the appropriate quantity of salt to make it isotonic without too much effort on the part of the user.
1) Eat a chili pepper. As hot as you can handle. The point is to get you perspiring and salivating. Will completely drain your sinuses in the next 5 mins.
2) Aerobic exercise or a run for 10 mins.
3) Inhaling steam.