To my mind, if there had been no "pizzagate", there would have been no spike in "fake news", and we wouldn't even be talking about "fake news" today.
To my mind, if there had been no "pizzagate", there would have been no spike in "fake news", and we wouldn't even be talking about "fake news" today.
Yes, putting the two words "fake" and "news" together into a Google search happened prior to pizzagate. But the term "fake news" as it's understood now came about as a result of the propaganda that was spread during the election and only recently became part of our lexicon, lexicon meaning common usage.
Fake news was not part of our lexicon well before pizzagate.
Pizzagate refers to one instance of fake news, but fake news cannot be used in place of the phrase. I would say the term may have been pushed in place of "propaganda" since media outlets wanted to distance themselves from the tactics, but pizzagate cannot be used to refer to any fake news in general.
Had there been no pizzagate we would still be discussing fake news, as it is only one of a multitude of examples.
Bob: “Alice is a reptile from the planet Xenon!”
Carol: “That’s clearly not true. What Bob is saying is fake.”
Bob: “See! Carol is part of the concpiary!”
I'm not trying to say that people who use the term now are using it in place of "pizzagate", but that media outlets, during the months of December 2016 and early 2017, used the phrase to talk around "pizzagate"; and now "pizzagate" has faded, but "fake news" remains.
I think propaganda is a more appopriate word, and we should just use that. But because of the way associations work, whenever I see "fake news", I am reminded of "pizzagate". And I know I'm not the only one.
I find the term juvenile, personally, but it's here to stay for now it seems.
Trump's adoption of the term to preempt that use was very successful, as is evident in the common perception that it is something he invented.