What do you take out of a story such as this?
money.cnn.com
money.cnn.com
My only problem with it would be meaning-- I'd have trouble doing something that would probably have no trace when I was gone, aside perhaps from whatever philanthropy resulted.
Excellent article, by the way; reminds me of the old Reddit.
However, speaking of Reddit, this is pretty tangential to startups-- beware of community drift!
Not terribly surprising, considering how many of the people on the leaderboard are refugees from it.
"By the way," says Charan, "the last time I talked about Steve Jobs, remember? I've now verified from two directors of Apple, and they say it's right on the button." Gomber and Bartridge perk up their ears. "I asked, Well, tell me his three God's gifts. And they think about it, and they say first thing, this human being has a talent to figure out what the consumer really wants. This is a very valuable thing! No. 2, he has the will and the talent to find - no matter where it is! - the right technology that will deliver what they want. Nobody said he invented one! And third, he has the talent to create demand at the right time. I say, Where do you find those human beings? But he is one."
He clearly makes a great deal of money, but according to the article, he doesn't use it at all. His life is his work - no romance, no home. Does he ever take a vacation?
He focuses on purpose to explain his lifestyle, and has clearly achieved incredible success at his business. But what about forging intimate personal relationships, both romantic and with friends?
I get such great value from having close relationships, a "home", an "office" that to imagine life without them is almost impossible. Of course he has 30+ year relationships with his clients, so maybe he has developed close friendships with some of them.
If Rand had created him as a character, maybe the purpose would be to show the downside of total focus on only business. Life without romance - never!