Yes, this is different but the ease with which the Russians are blamed seems to be very wide spread. Of course, we never get to see and investigate the evidence.
[0] https://tweakers.net/reviews/6031/een-ddoser-betrapt-hoe-de-...
Yes, this is different but the ease with which the Russians are blamed seems to be very wide spread. Of course, we never get to see and investigate the evidence.
[0] https://tweakers.net/reviews/6031/een-ddoser-betrapt-hoe-de-...
There was a case with a local MP here who was supporting an unpopular bill, so his website got DDOS'd and the next day he was in the media talking about how this had to be a sophisticated attack. Basically implying that it had to be a rogue state behind it, not mentioning Russia by name, but it was obvious, cringy, sad and obvious.
But now they're reaping what they sow.
[0] - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/18/russias-deadly-pl...
There have been psychology studies on this effect but I can’t find the references atm.
> Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect works as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray’s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward-reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them. In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story-and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read with renewed interest as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about far-off Palestine than it was about the story you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.
I swear I've seen this confirmed in some psychology studies but I can't find them right now.