Women Accusing WikiLeaks Founder Maintains Charges of Sexual Misconduct
newsweek.com
newsweek.com
A detailed, chronological account of the women’s alleged encounters with Assange—which in both cases began with consensual sexual contact but later included what the women claimed was nonconsensual sex, in which Assange didn’t use a condom
I'm confused I thought non-consensual sex was rape, or is there a law in Sweden that says women who regret their sexual encounters can now withdraw consent retroactively?
More pessimistically, in the US, at least, there is no requirement to communicate the withdrawal of consent - during an act, a partner may decide to withdraw consent, and it is withdrawn regardless of whether it is communicated or indicated in any way; combined with the issue of proving whether consent was given or not, this means that retroactively withdrawing consent is trivial. I am not familiar with Swedish law, but I doubt that it fixes these issues - preventing false negatives seems to generally be considered more important than preventing false positives, to most people.