Generally speaking, money invested in improving building efficiency will have a better carbon and financial payback than any form of solar, wind, or hydro. And yet, homeowners will get solar panels before they insulate their walls.
Generally speaking, money invested in improving building efficiency will have a better carbon and financial payback than any form of solar, wind, or hydro. And yet, homeowners will get solar panels before they insulate their walls.
Passive solar / solar hot water heaters let you have the best of both worlds with ~zero monthly heating costs and plenty of fresh air.
Depends on where you live I suppose.
I was talking with my landlord a couple weeks ago about solar water heating (surprisingly rare in Arizona being the desert and all) and he said he looked into it before but it would cost more than gas due to all the bureaucratic hurdles put in the way -- which explains the rarity I guess.
Under "Bausubstanz & Energieausweis" it lists the energy required to heat the apartment in kWh/m^2.
(I don't live in Germany, but have been considering moving).
http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/sites/default/files/repo...