Are you still unable to see the point?
Imagine you live in a big family and people come and go all day long and no one remembers to turn the thermostat down when they’re the last person to leave.
Are you still unable to see the point?
(Sometimes it seems like “I don’t see the point” is code for “I can’t imagine a lifestyle different than my own”)
If I leave the house for a few hours on the weekend, there isn't a big enough energy savings for turning it off. My range of comfortable temperatures is large enough that feeling cold while sitting on the couch and needing to turn the thermostat up a few degrees higher than normal doesn't sound plausible. Like wearing a wristwatch, this just seems like more trouble than it's worth.
It is not uncommon.
- Turn it off from bed when I forget to do it before going to sleep. My system is too loud for us to have it one while we sleep.
- Peace of mind that I didn't leave it on while outside the house. It just detects when our phones have left. Whatever savings that makes, too.
- Similarly, it starts when it detects our phones are about to enter the house, so when we get in the heater is already on to welcome us.
- No need to walk all the way to it, all freezing, first thing in the morning. If I need to wake up before it turns on automatically, I just tell it to turn on from bed.
I think many of the cost savings from auto-away would only be realized for the lazy/inattentive and particularly for those with air conditioning, which is far more expensive to run than heat.
Also, it's really nice to turn on the heat before arriving home when it's been off all weekend, or at the cabin for a weekend skiing. The difference between walking into a 38 degree house and a 50 degree house is pretty large.
1) "It pays for itself"
2) It looks fancy and expensive
Offer people a fancy expensive-looking thing for "free", and they'll take it. It's marketing genius, really.