6.4 Earthquake hits Taiwan
earthquake.usgs.gov
earthquake.usgs.gov
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us1000chhc...
They put this type of report together for each significant quake and it will inform you very quickly about how concerned you should be. In this case, both the Estimated Fatalities and Estimated Economic Losses are in the green bands, so nearly everyone should be ok even if they feel a bit shaken (ahem).
The next one is the earthquake information after it happens.
So, its not surprising that a top-priority message would show as a Presidential Alert in a US phone if the same basic technology and rough semantics are used.
There has also been a bunch of smaller earthquakes happening regularly over the last few days.
I wish that were more true. In 2016, 116 people died in a building that collapsed in Tainan.
"Reuters witnesses at the scene of the collapse have seen large rectangular, commercial cans of cooking-oil packed inside wall cavities exposed by the damage, apparently having been used as building material.
Taiwan media has also reported the presence of polystyrene in supporting beams, mixed in with concrete."[1]
---
"The municipality has mobilized a team of engineers and architects to survey the city and tag potentially dangerous buildings, marking at least 340 buildings at risk in the event of another earthquake.
Of these 340, only 319 have been completely surveyed, with 48 found to be highly threatened buildings and 45 threatened buildings.
The Kaohsiung City Government also designated two engineers to determine its threat level in the event of an earthquake, with only 14 at-risk buildings reported.
All 14 have been surveyed, with two considered highly threatened and one threatened in the event of an earthquake, the city government said." [2]
---
It's very likely more people will die in future earthquakes due to cost-cutting construction.
[1] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-quake-taiwan-crime/taiwan...
[2] http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2016/02/14/2...
This is relevant. Prices soared across the industry after the 1999 quake. I believe prices rose several hundred dollars for individual PCs for most / all manufacturers.
Edit: oops, not Samsung of course.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jwebb/2016/02/29/the-taiwanese-...
Here's a reliable source: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-42966916
The Richter scale measures and describes impacts, so you already know the impact from the 6.4 rating itself.
For 6.0 to 6.9:
> Damage to a moderate number of well-built structures in populated areas. Earthquake-resistant structures survive with slight to moderate damage. Poorly designed structures receive moderate to severe damage. Felt in wider areas; up to hundreds of miles/kilometers from the epicenter. Strong to violent shaking in epicentral area.
Also, your link added very little info, and the only mention of the building toppling (the infamous impacts) are in the title, with no reports, photos, or witness accounts (as of yet).
I like that the OP didn't fall into voyeurism, that the title was enough to inform me that a strong earthquake happened in Taiwan, and that the source was enough to confirm it.
For the rest, I'll have the evening news, or BBC articles, but I don't think I need them here on HN or that they were needed for this particular piece of information, at this point in time.
Anyway: exactly how much damage an earthquake does varies wildly with exactly where it hits and what sort of shaking it produces and what time of day it is and the technical data doesn't always capture it perfectly. You can't know whether buildings actually did collapse (and were there people inside? how many?) without actual reporting.
Also, this is HN: pedantry is built-in. Not saying it's a feature, but I guess it was a manufacturing defect I've gotten accustomed to. I don't mind. To each to have their own filter :)
I'm sorry, this is not quite true. The Richter scale measures the amplitude of seismic waves; the description you highlight is what might be expected generally, but doesn't give us any indication of the actual on-the-ground impact that any particular quake might have.
And of course it does not give a precise description of the actual impacts for a given event, but I don't think it's generally far off the bat. But I'm no seismologist.
EG:
This is moment magnitude, not Richter. Specifically, 6.4 "Mww", or "Moment magnitude derived from a centroid moment tensor inversion of the W-phase", whatever that means. [1]
[1] https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/terms.php
There's a hundred "softer" links to choose from among international press, but which one to pick? Better let those fill the comments, rather than steer the whole thread.
(for the record, my girlfriend's aunt lives in Hualien, and I have visited several times - I'm in no way emotionally indifferent to this event)
That's odd and interesting
- On Sep 19, 2017 - 7.1 magnitude https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Central_Mexico_earthquake - On Sep 19, 1985 - 8.0 magnitude https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1985_Mexico_City_earthquake
They offered, but it was refused.