Intelligence is so overrated, knowledge and persistence are so underrated.
Wouldn't the one with more knowledge be better at solving problems, because he has more knowledge that he can use intelligently to solve a problem?
If one were to agree with that, applying the same rule, wouldn't it be possible that a person with lesser inherent intelligence but enough of more knowledge out do a person of greater intelligence but with lesser knowledge, if the positive delta of intelligence is enough to overcome the negative delta of intelligence?
And how much influence does persistence have on the breadth or/and depth of knowledge one gains in one or many domains, as compared to intelligence?