Georgia Must Block This Flawed Computer Crime Bill

Something I'm unclear about regarding U.S. jurisprudence in general, and perhaps this bill in particular:

Suppose this bill becomes law, and a regular citizen wishes to help legislators understand the folly of their ways.

So he creates a website designed to be an object lesson for the legislators who passed the bill. Through some combination of website design and social engineering, he creates a scenario where the politicians themselves, as well as their friends and families, are likely to violate the terms of service. And in fact, they do.

- Are the politicians subject to criminal sanctions only if government prosector is interested in pursuing the charges? I.e., is "prosecutorial discretion" applicable regardless of the crime?

- If the bill allows for civil penalties, are they still applicable in cases where the regular citizen had the agenda described above?

This is akin to arresting a movie theater patron for bringing in outside food.

Here's a link that lists all sorts of laws in Georgia that makes you wonder what they were thinking.

http://www.dumblaws.com/laws/united-states/georgia

Someone should please add some paragraph breaks in there if this is something intended to be shared or read by others.

Apologies for the meta-comment, but this is a particularly nasty wall-of-text obscuring an important point.

I had to read the comments before realising that the headline referred to the US state, not the country. Perhaps it would be useful to add (US) after the name to avoid such confusion?