V8 JavaScript Engine Release v6.5
v8project.blogspot.com
v8project.blogspot.com
However I noticed that Firefox's recent update with their streaming and tiered WASM compiler is still almost a magnitude faster (using the benchmark at [0] it takes 717ms in Firefox 58, and 4283ms in Chrome 66 on my machine with a good gigabit connection and an i7 4930k)
I tend to think of my PC as fairly "high end" (yeah, it's a few years old, but still is a powerhouse in my opinion!) but I'm just not seeing the speeds that they are talking about in the blog post.
Is the difference really just in Firefox's 2-tiered compiler!? I noticed that the benchmarks are in seconds (!) of compile time, does this streaming compiler only really shine with much larger WASM modules? Or is that benchmark not a good representation of a general workload (it was made by a Mozilla employee, for what it's worth).
https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/535
https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es7/2016-...
For all of Google's talk about their syntactic tail call proposal, they haven't cared enough to implement it -- only to remove their PTC code. FF and MS are in the same position. At this point, I don't really care one way or the other, they need to quit the excuses, quit the petty power struggles, and do something one way or the other. Every year they wait is another year before we can use it.
EDIT: I'd also add that the performance impact in the real world seems to be close to zero.
Edit: Seems to work ok with content blockers disabled.
iPhone 8, latest release of iOS.