Have $1 million in assets outside of your primary home or make $200k+ per year for the last 2 years with the reasonable assumption you will continue to.
Have $1 million in assets outside of your primary home or make $200k+ per year for the last 2 years with the reasonable assumption you will continue to.
If you do it as a hobby, count on losing every penny you put in, and treating that as the cost of pursuing your hobby.
If you do it as a business, count on working on it full time, i.e. AT LEAST 40 hours a week, and probably more like 60-80. The competition is fierce. And I would not do it with less than $1M in LIQUID assets which I could afford to lose. The reason you need this much is that in order to have a good shot at a return you need to be able to do two things: 1) invest in a pretty broad portfolio (i.e. at least 10 companies) and 2) have enough money to participate in follow-on rounds so you don't get diluted into oblivion.
Follow-on investments are economically just like making later-stage investments. The average return can be good, but you can also lose all your money and you need much more capital to participate.
Is there any good reason why these opportunities for follow-on investment might have higher expected returns than, e.g. putting the same amount of money into other seed investments? e.g. is it possible that if you participate in the follow-on, that you get some extra leverage to convert your previous shares into a more favourable class?
> And I would not do it with less than $1M in LIQUID assets which I could afford to lose.
IMHO -> Rule #2: If you do it as a business, don't use your money and use a standard 2/20 model. Why someone would do seed investing working 60-80 hours a week and use your own capital is beyond me.
I’m surprised YC has that as a requirement to participate in demo day, seems kind of archaic for a disrupter.
Maybe they find those exceptions to onerous and burdensome, but in my mind that just means there is a giant opportunity - 90% of the US market is being excluded.