That's not the concern. The concern is that if you have a contract that promises to pay the bearer X and you don't pay the bearer X when they ask because you lied, then that's fraud.
It's especially frowned upon when X has 10 digits before the dp.
Now, I happen to think that the Tether folk have been a tad more crafty than some of the black and white commentary is making out. More specifically, if they've been careful with who they've allowed to set up accounts, it may be effectively impossible for them to be called out.
I also don't think the CFTC calling in Dec is that interesting. It probably precipitated their change in T&Cs at the beginning of Jan though.
Guess we'll find out.
And again, you're missing the point that it doesn't seem like they are selling the USDT for anything, BTC or otherwise. They're just printing it and buying BTC with it.
EDIT:
That may seem like splitting hairs but the point is they aren't issuing them in exchange for value, they're just creating them and then using the value they supposedly have based to purchase BTC.
An analogy if you still don't understand the difference; it's the difference between buying a $50 Gift Certificate to a store with $50 USD or just printing one on my printer. One represents $50 USD that exist and were exchanged to buy it, and the other represents nothing.
Edit: the assumption seems to be that they are buying bitcoin and holding it, which would increase the bid and result in not being backed by USD. If they are not holding the bitcoin, then the buys and sells even out, and they are not adding to the bid, and they hold cash equivalent to USDT. I am quite interested to find out which it is.
I think the math is fairly straightforward. There is a USD/USDT driven cross. Creating and destroying USDT is straightforward there. There is also a BTC/USDT cross. That creates a drive for USDT. If that demand to sell BTC and buy USDT bids up USDT, then USDT would be created, and the BTC would convert back to USD. I agree that Tether is not forthcoming that this happens, but yes this is exactly what I would expect to happen. Its not mysterious sounding to me, or necessarily nefarious. I dont understand why Im beimg downvoted, its a discussion about generic market mechanics. We can leave bogeyman words out of it.
It's called "lying" and "fraud", your "but what if they did have the cash" is irrelevant, because they don't, and you're getting downvoted because you're aggressively refusing to address that point in favor of hypotheticals.
Could you hypothetically have a legitimate Tether token? Yeah, sure. Is the Tether Foundation on the up and up? Hell no.
There's a reason their auditor bailed before completing the audit.
EDIT: This apparently is no longer a site to ask questions or to challenge assumptions in good faith to get at an understanding. Its a religious conversation. One takes things on faith, or GTFO, apparently.
Going from USDT to USD in a roundabout way through BTC doesn't change anything if USDT themselves are bullshit.
RE your EDIT: it is, but deep downthread like this, it's always luck what you get. Also don't worry about the downvotes, everyone gets their share of them here :).
I dont know the answer to the above, but its critical for the future price of bitcoin and is really really important. Everyone just seems to assume they held the bitcoin, which is a crazy move. If they could have sold for USD, it makes sense to me they would have...thats why I think its an important question. It doesnt seem to interest anyone else tho, which is fine.
The comment above said liquidity dictates they could not have, that they must still be holding bitcoin. But I also say today, bitfinex'ed, the blogger that has been on this story, says they redeemed 330 million in past 24 hrs. Which is far above the 10% of 2 billion number he said of the entire crypto market is backed by USD. So to say the liquidity doesnt exist doesnt seem to make sense, there seem to be a lot of dollars into crypto. 1 million people with $1000 invested is a billion alone. That isnt crazy.
This is irrelevant, though. You can commit fraud without losing any money - Martin Shkreli was famously convicted of fraud a few months ago even though the victims all came out ahead.
In the USDT -> BTC -> USD trip, there is a point, namely the BTC part, where more USDT has been issued than USD has been accepted. If they claim USDT is backed by USD, but there were points where that was not true, they have committed fraud, regardless of whether they were lucky enough to come out ahead.
So, whether their books line up is irrelevant to whether they committed fraud, perhaps, but VERY relevant to the price of bitcoin.
It's like having a printing press that creates legitimate money. No individual loses, but the prices of everything you can buy will artificially increase (or another way to look at that is the currency deflates) if you print enough of it.
You'd be flooding the market Tethers nobody is asking for, which risks crashing the value of Tethers. They could buy back the tethers for dollars to stablize the price, but that would make the whole transaction useless.
There is also volitity risk. In a falling market they might lose money.
I dont see it as flooding the market with anything, the Tethers are created in effect by people exiting cryptos into Tether on all these exchanges that only deal with Tether rather than USD (potentially!).
Lets step back to Tether creation. There are zero out there. Someone gives Tether $10 million for 10 million USDT. Those matriculate out in the universe, and are being exchanged back and forth for cryptos. Someone somewhere always holds those 10 million Tether. The price of cryptos rises and rises. Now all of a sudden the demand for USDT has increased, as people who exit crypto on those exchanges need more units than before, rather than 8500 USDT per BTC its 20000 USDT per BTC. No one has given Tether anymore USD directly for USDT. What would happen in this scenario is the price of USDT would rise. One way, not the only way, but one way for Tether to bring the price back under control, would be to buy BTC for USDT, issuing new shares, to bring the price back down. Which at $1 means equillibrium.
Is that how things work, I certainly dont know. But that mechanism is one way it could work. And it could explain why USDT are created on down days. Its the demand of people getting out of BTC driving it.
Now they could totally take that money and spend it on hookers and yachts for all I know...but thats at the end of the chain.