Scientists Discover a Bone-Deep Risk for Heart Disease
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
If CHIP is as serious and common a risk factor as claimed, and there is no known prevention or treatment, then testing anything that could interact with it is very important.
Anecdotal evidence. I’ve had a weird, small bump on my arm. Like a large pimple, but not gross. Got it checked. Dr said it was fine, not a toumor. Just a knot or something like that. Said it’s conmon for men over 35. One day I fasted on a bet for 2 days straight. Zero calories. Only water and coffee. The bump went away by 80%. Only a slight dark mark left.
This evidence was enough to convince me that fasting is good. Now intermittent fast every day. I get better focus. I have my first meal around 1-3pm.
From the article:
"But others, especially those linked to leukemia, seem to give stem cells a new ability to accumulate in the marrow. The result is a sort of survival of the fittest, or fastest growing, stem cells in the marrow."
One could make reasonable hypotheses that fasting has no effect, or a deleterious effect, on the prevalence of these mutated stem cells.
I think a good first step would be to track down people who regularly practice prolonged fasting, and then find people who match them as closely as possible on all other biometrics. We could then take blood samples and compare the prevalence of the CHIP mutation in their white blood cells. If there's a significant difference then it would be worth further investigation.
If you haven't seen the site yet, check it out: http://www.sens.org
Erm... Getting to 115 sort of negates the argument doesn't it? She managed to get through decades of 50% heart attack risk. A single counter example isn't evidence, but given with all the given issues this does seem to be anomalous.
same team apparently