Tarsnap Support for Bitcoin Ending April First
mail.tarsnap.com
mail.tarsnap.com
In this post Colin casually speaks out against proof-of-work, without taking any credit for his significant indirect influence on it.
Now you're dangerously close to figuring out that you can make more money by waiting for the best time to clear the block.
Once you've crossed that bridge, if your business has any margin at all, it's not hard to imagine that keeping some of the exchanged crypto currency back from each clearing block until the next block, or even longer, during any bullish run (that we've seen on more than one occasion) can result in a measurable margin increase with a fairly low (or at worst, quantified) risk profile.
Not sure what my point was really — that's just about exactly how this plays out.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/24/16930010/50-cent-rich-bit...
[1]https://www.thedailybeast.com/where-did-wikileaks-dollar25-m...
Yes, you could have made a lot of money with bitcoin, same of you would put all your money on 7 black in roulette. Hindsight is always 20/20.
In terms of what you might have made, there is no difference between 1) accepting Bitcoin as an experimental payment method in an existing business; and 2) accepting cash as usual and using that to buy some Bitcoin as an experiment.
What would have been much easier is 3) buying some Bitcoin as an experiment outside of the operation of a business. Because you wouldn't have had to worry about how to handle it in your business accounts, or set up an automated payment flow for it, and so forth.
You might as well be asking "I wonder how much people made from the Bitcoin rise".
E.g small coins like sucr or madcoin target specific populations (here south america and maroco). Monero is used by the darknet community. Ripple by the gafas and big financial entities. Ethereum is loved by start ups and geeks. Lightcoin is nice for traders to transfert funds between exhanges cheaper and faster than with btc. Etc.
If you just want to make money however, you target stuff that have a strong chance of going back up in the next month, but is currently very low. Philscurrency is an example of that, with the masternode going from 2.7k to 13k and back to 3k. Having a good rythm and patience is key. But phils has no specific advantages over other coins. It just looks a lot like alqo, and may follow the same path, being now at 23k for one mn. But why does it move that way ? The community on bitcointalk or discord is a big factor.
There are now more than 1300 altcoins, 10% of that only really have something technically unique (having masternodes or dark send is very common nowaday) or a good project (zencash, wagerr, stellar, kryll, etc. are exceptions, not the norm). But because we are in a bubble, most of them are economically very active anyway. So betting on the community is a better metric.
Of course it takes time to get in touch with each of them.
In terms of price stable crypto-currencies there's tether, which is looking very much like a scam, and some kind of complicated ethereum contract token the name of which slips my mind at the moment.
The stellar network is supposed to be able to be used to make payments without necessarily involving stellars (except to fund the transaction). But the anchors and trust web needed to do that don't exist (yet?)
Bitcoin, however, will remain king because it's the first (Lindy effect) and it still offers more than any of the clones.
I like Raiblocks. It really functions the way that people want Bitcoin to function (free, instant, complete [no dust] transfers).
“Do you want to meet up and pay me in Starbucks?”
“Sure where do you want to meet?”
“Starbucks”
“yeah i know you are paying me in starbucks but where you wanna meet?”
It generally makes sense for changes that affect accounting to start on the first day of a quarter.