Hacker News Reader

I don't understand why Mozilla prioritised integrating and then buying a closed-source alternative to the existing open-source project Wallabag.

How does deeply integrating one service provider — making it harder for their competition — promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web?

Mozilla acquired Pocket last year, so I assume they want to use it as much as they can.

extensions.pocket.enabled=false

Which would be the default, if Mozilla cared about users.

It would be a fully removable extension if it actually did. Nothing less. Even after Pocket code is open source, if at all - the least I am going to accept from Firefox is:

1. pocket as a fully removable extension

2. turned off by default