An 18 Billion Mile Journey is almost complete.
scienceblogs.com
scienceblogs.com
It will return to the same position within its orbit relative to the sun, but surely not the "same position in space"? (The solar system has moved a little further around in its orbit within the Milky Way too.)
I'm aware I'm questioning a qualified astrophysicist here - something I am not - so I'll blindly assume it's something to do with default frames of reference until corrected otherwise ;-)
I wonder, though, it should be in the same position in the sky, right (after accounting for the Earth not necessarily being in sync with regard to its rotation)?
I'm not sure what you mean "after accounting for the Earth not necessarily being in sync"; since it isn't in sync it won't be in the same position. But if you were viewing it from the centre of the Sun, then yes, it would be in the same position in the sky.
That from some point on Earth (on a similar latitude - accounting for tilt) Neptune would be in the same position in the sky (because other than the tilt, the time of day would likely be different so the longitude of observation should be too).
In writing that, though, I just realized the flaw in my thinking. Not only would the rotation of the Earth not be in sync, nor would its orbit! So the chance of being able to repeat the precise observation at the specified time would be close to nil.
http://voeventnet.caltech.edu/feeds/Catalina.shtml
The essence is to make multiple passes over the sky, comparing current images with past images. Large image-differences represent moving objects, which are looked up in a database. If they are new, they are entered into an event queue, represented above. In principle, other robotic telescopes can scoop up promising events and follow up on them.