It's interesting to note, that when Obama used the platform to get elected, no one minded. But, when the opposing party does it, everyone judges it negatively.
It's interesting to note, that when Obama used the platform to get elected, no one minded. But, when the opposing party does it, everyone judges it negatively.
I would say it was their behaving suspiciously that causes people to be suspicious of it.
> when Obama used the platform to get elected, no one minded. But, when the opposing party does it, everyone judges it negatively
At the risk of getting too political, I believe only one of those campaigns has been confirmed by the company to have been operated in part by foreign powers actively attempting to subvert the election. That's a bit beyond "i like the one guy better" as far as reasons for judgement go.
Oh, and Obama won the popular election. Twice.
When history sandwiches you between two world leaders with an apparently combined IQ of 2, people might let some questionable things slip.