Edit: I think many are missing the point that a fork and the original BTC blockchain are not of equal value. Maybe a more apt analogy would have been countries in the EU leaving and issuing their own currency.
Edit: I think many are missing the point that a fork and the original BTC blockchain are not of equal value. Maybe a more apt analogy would have been countries in the EU leaving and issuing their own currency.
Where do alts (esp non POW alts) get their value? Because people want to trade them to get more bitcoin, which has value as per above.
You can keep repeating this circa 2014 argument 'not backed blah blah', but as yet it has not gone to 0, and likely never will.
""" Should it be treated as a split of BTC?
That seems incorrect and complicated. If you half the value of your BTC holdings and sell them, you will incur more gains. However, could you determine how much were short-term and long-term? The BCH would also be classed as income at this point, since it now has a value, and so will incur income taxes. Unlike stocks that split, BCH and BTC are separate digital assets that have no common markets, and will have different values going forward. """
Another fork will add ZKP privacy, new utility and new value.