Linux Torvads calls Intel patches 'complete and utter garbage' | Hacker News Reader

Linux Torvads calls Intel patches 'complete and utter garbage'

linux.slashdot.org

27 pointsMilnerRoute13 comments

Open articleView on HN

Dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16202205

Who is Linux Torvad?

No matter who he is, he should still be referred to as "GNU/Linux Torvads."

Not sure if you are being serious or just trolling.

*Linux Torvads

Must be typing with a head cold.

Linus Torvalds again uses abusive wording when he could've made his point just as clearly without it. As the leader of a project he should avoid that - it's massively detrimental that contributors fear being the target of his next rant.

Agreed. Frankly I'm amazed that the linux kernel has been such a hit with leadership like that. Torvald seems brilliant, but he also seems like a royal asshole. Why anybody would want to work with him is confusing to me.

He's not an asshole. He just uses profanity to make the point that would otherwise be missed.

An ass would be mean with no reason behind it. Linus always has a reason and often a good one.

Low tolerance for dumb and hacks is actually a good thing.

He is very defensive and dismissive of his own mistakes. Linus suggested the removal of a memory barrier and subsequently broke locking on kernels for most of 2014. The fix did not get into most distributions until 2016, since it was kept quiet and not communicated. The result is that deadlocks seemingly occur at random, causing complaints from users of my libraries. It has wasted many hours of my time, and surely more for others. However the more experience you have, typically the more forgiving you are to mistakes as we all make them. Linus lacks that and acts childish, making it very difficult to respect someone who disrespects everyone else.

In the multicultural environment and on project where quality is critical, this is what is required. You need to make sure that your point is getting across. Even after 4 years in the UK I often misunderstood what "good" can mean in different contexts.

You will not hear many stories about Jobs and Gates throwing fucks because it was either verbal or protected by contract.

Reminds me of the assholeness of Steve Jobs.

I think the language makes his point far clearer, in a way that would be nigh impossible to do otherwise given the deeply technical nature of the topic.

Not commenting on the larger point, just this part:

> when he could've made his point just as clearly without it

Reply on news.ycombinator.com